From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i6zmJ-0001r9-AP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 12:11:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6zmI-0003Rx-8a for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 12:11:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58484) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6zmI-0003Rm-5N for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 12:11:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i6zmH-0002Q6-Tv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 12:11:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#37305] [PATCH] Allow booting from a Btrfs subvolume. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87sgpby4p9.fsf@gmail.com> From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <87sgpby4p9.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 17:10:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87mufeojks.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com Cc: 37305@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hello! > > I'm sending this patch series to add support for booting off Btrfs > subvolumes. There was some interested shown on #guix, so hopefully > someone can test it on their system :-) > > Before this change, it wasn't possible to pass the required options to > the Linux kernel as our init script would ignore them. > > I'm not including system tests yet, as this will take a bit more time > and is starting to be a big change in itself. Hey, I haven't got around to looking at this yet, but I did write a system test when I reported this bug [1], it's in the 0001-WIP-Btrfs-store-subvolume-test.patch file in the initial message [2]. Maybe you could see if that passes with your changes here? 1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33517 2: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33517#5 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl11J+RfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XeqCw//dzTr+fXTT2cQcmyIr6hHgN01PMo99uAkjkcg6wqa5sHmSAV7cilf4iQ5 GhkwUToC8swwoeXLplKB/3mSZ+Q70qkNazLOEDP6Ff6z+IXHVcbVMYbEdPb2ugri diwnnFvBuRvH2n2JYjG8STkOfQWFcBEkL2+5Eed16KQ9OpSWyy3FHptxdpz+U6pa GlXKkmd4zUOJ5Qg6UtYRDstohX4c2w9hMzbe1rViSrOlTVbWs3ExDm4zewY77z3W ahVe26YK3tYBpXo+kyn8l/vYPLAzV92vSELHaKzSo40sxAczugjjIwTgB2UJDWyY 9SwRznty5DnfNgGB4DHd8QUjrmL+bNZ6SvfhFBHq1FNkGekHpo2Big3ysU1VA0II aeTirw0H8/zS4SG6UuGpboZK4ItccbFmytrsGjiNZ5SyLlBISmXGCZejBLlHOzgj mbsrgebene51W/H+6fSCXvlQatw7vVfnYBbhcAz86HdeeuU55+0PXAdbiSkqrHLk +Y6YjM6FHPDTPNJaTKY7OkDSIxVmzPAoqduoQ67WVTE8Ig5AM/XKA3p7tfL6vxqF A+a3pcgeWl/CcUMOsHiU1QnWAtezIjQ2levvcCHB/wgnDqPAYgwNs7arKXMHLoSr jbWySATWSoLKr7eLiNzJCcSrfogBtxLcPm6OQEsx8Jap0k6a6Xo= =y5iw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--