From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Rosset Subject: Re: qtwenengine anybody? Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 02:54:53 -0800 Message-ID: <87muareide.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87immgp582.fsf@gmail.com> <5955729d-ef57-ffb8-feb8-36a9f53658a2@crazy-compilers.com> <87d0clpbt6.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2v7e0g4.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87v9qb56gg.fsf@gmail.com> <87sglfotvj.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o8w354m5.fsf@gmail.com> <87blrod2so.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <878smsd2pe.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87mub7krlq.fsf@gmail.com> <87tv5e9acb.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o8vmn6an.fsf@elephly.net> <87zhf2c5jy.fsf@gmail.com> <87lfql7k9w.fsf@elephly.net> <87d0bw2xtj.fsf@devup.no> <871rsccdq8.fsf@gmail.com> <871rsbxdzt.fsf@gmail.com> <878smdzydh.fsf@devup.no> <87zhetj3hv.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqxN5-0000gO-8M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 05:55:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqxN4-0001Xk-8Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 05:54:59 -0500 In-reply-to: <87zhetj3hv.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: GNU Guix maintainers , guix-devel@gnu.org Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Hooray! > > Thank you Marius, and thank you Mike for the tremendous effort! > >> Now we just need some packages using it! :-) > > We can get started with Qutebrowser. Hello Pierre and Marius, I've have sent some patches to an open bug #38148 in regards to qutebrowser being outdated. I'm hoping this will help test out qtwebengine and close that bug. Two birds with one stone :) The patch includes python-pyqtwebengine and upgrade of qutebrowser to 1.9.0 and it now uses qtwebengine. If anyone can help review and make suggestions that would be great. On second thought maybe I should have emailed them to guix-patches@gnu.org. Let me know if that's better for reviewing. Mike