From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44819)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jLlbL-0005Gb-Dg
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 06:37:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jLlbK-0001wm-I2
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 06:37:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38083)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jLlbK-0001we-El
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 06:37:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jLlbK-00071s-D0
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 06:37:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script"
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40373.B40373.158625581127001@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <m1d08rmh6g.fsf@khs-macbook.home> <875zeiudjm.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m1a73umkbw.fsf@khs-macbook.home> <87mu7slwwh.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m1blo34q5r.fsf@khs-macbook.home>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 12:36:41 +0200
In-Reply-To: <m1blo34q5r.fsf@khs-macbook.home> (Konrad Hinsen's message of
 "Tue, 07 Apr 2020 11:10:40 +0200")
Message-ID: <87mu7na8g6.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net>
Cc: 40373@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello,

Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net> skribis:

> From a user interface point of view, it is preferable to have many
> commands with clear names, rather than few commands overloaded with
> multiple functions selected by cryptic options.

I agree overall, though it=E2=80=99s not black and white: the benefit of ha=
ving
separate commands weakens as they proliferate.  A new command may be
more difficult to discover than an option to an existing command.

But anyway, let=E2=80=99s see how we can get =E2=80=98run-script=E2=80=99 i=
n!  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.