From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id aOjoL6kDBGCVPwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 09:30:17 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id cPa4K6kDBGBxXAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 09:30:17 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C1199404C2 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 09:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45056 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l14Nx-00066w-UJ for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 04:30:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51730) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l14Nn-00066o-HJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 04:30:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l14Nn-0002is-9F for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 04:30:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l14Nn-0000tp-3x for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 04:30:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64 Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 09:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45826 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 45826-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45826.16108758003418 (code B ref 45826); Sun, 17 Jan 2021 09:30:03 +0000 Received: (at 45826) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2021 09:30:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44554 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l14Nj-0000t4-Pi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 04:30:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58516) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l14Nh-0000sr-TC for 45826@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 04:29:59 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l14Nc-0002aE-Cy; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 04:29:52 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:1538:87ab:3a95:7600] (port=43980 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l14Nb-0007eu-R8; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 04:29:52 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <87eeioczws.fsf@yamatai> <877dod1al9.fsf@yamatai> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 10:29:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 16 Jan 2021 13:58:39 -0500") Message-ID: <87mtx7hpwy.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45826@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-sysadmin@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.86 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5C1199404C2 X-Spam-Score: -2.86 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: ZkBmdYEjDSsw Hello Leo & Guillaume, > That's a good observation. I hadn't thought of it. > > I'm CC-ing Mathieu Othacehe and guix-sysadmin so that we can disable > these builds until we can fix the bug for real. Mathieu: this might > explain why the build farm is spending all its effort on aarch64. If we want to disable SBCL builds temporarily we can do something similar to what I did to disable Rust builds on non-x86_64 architectures here: 0ed631866cc0b7cece2b0a0b50e39b37ae91bb67. Regarding the rebuilding that is a limitation of the new Cuirass remote building mechanism I am aware of and I need to solve. As build failures are only cached of the machine performing the build and the builds are now distributed to all the machines across the build farm, we need to find a way to centralize the builds failure cache. It would also be nice to optionally publish the build failures cache so that the user doesn't try to build a package that is known to be failing on the build farm. Chris, have you encountered this issue with the Build Coordinator? Thanks, Mathieu