From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id aN5oFPHVu2BKOwAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 21:52:17 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id YLuTD/HVu2BFYAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 19:52:17 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE6EC219FE for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 21:52:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49514 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpcL9-0008Lo-E0 for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 15:52:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpcKw-0008LS-N4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 15:52:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpcKw-0005Vm-Go for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 15:52:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpcKw-0004fB-GA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 15:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#47539] Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 19:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47539 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Leo Famulari , Leo Prikler Cc: 47539@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47539.162292272117917 (code B ref 47539); Sat, 05 Jun 2021 19:52:02 +0000 Received: (at 47539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2021 19:52:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50049 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpcKv-0004ev-Lh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 15:52:01 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:34116 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpcKt-0004ef-4e for 47539@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 15:52:00 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1622920598; bh=S6C9kP6ongB+6shfIdZ7L+M85GO5LNsJqYnEKIRREaY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=CDDqsAH+jpL2Cq35InMMN/L1z+aCm2K/B4FvMrmJTUWInIcBVozwRFAzUBatxb6aN 8vka/z/r7LC42l39XdyfzXxv7ruDtZ1exSdOyGTsK7SlHBf/IYCg85rNuOP5BcfbvF /4KitirHPBvrat+Pn9ADfYy/eR1xivWzaV2JXORM= In-Reply-To: References: <87y2dd8r18.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <87lf9d8l43.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 21:16:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87mts486ln.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1622922737; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=kbXpZRPuMwiVG0XoAvXSK0caEJIkXWv8Cnv6xsMkkas=; b=YZHXJpSifTUsZ/v0rpZ0RiRkQQFqC/x3GKyBY2BiKqveJTF65j46mTfwnxJA8ky4oT+HVb iai0CUx0i81dMSOyg39U5fWoCOZWAbQolDRB0aTU2LS72VydBZCsU8DhAabdiqF14JXBkc IKzn3hSamFan1LYUDDxlXScKO1CX1Ar4JpBxiHoTW/5+XR55b8gsuJ3kOaR5duhD8/JrUU Oqydw5IgZSDGcJ0Cxwvio0OGZ8sudG5bqTZVX5YfDWLR7oHiE/PL7AQvUXoYLvZ93K0Fmj 028OQlgb0SCPWwpJX3F0b11MLj36TqsF19IGitnb4a7oF9fdpQbGCeASte6Xrw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1622922737; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=O4f2u/zULTHqEkIQCg1Au+WeOJD9w9frOI8nAc6jTgpi73YAMX69XKZO8Mt3UdbfnN1Qc6 7e0GwkvljvozYiFJtmtstxOeg9Nf2xwxBLnlz38desERhVUe2RbhPyENcTtwaTmAbFs5ty TFNxZhXFq4c0Wqn0Q4Mymb+GkAlthzhapIT0RfL9DpyeOu+jeWGVPgi6ldkyt2Gp60IOyi XHJ0yx2vmFf68nZm3YF2ms4NwqD4O73CIJh+DEnDqiz0a7HrxL2Db8qHTaQVdyv8Yb0j2G U5pqLKXcyW1xxJv/CsU9XwIWXAH0J/Ssmrid4WM1IBPcviTjIswCee0m9tGDjg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=yoctocell.xyz header.s=mail header.b=CDDqsAH+; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=yoctocell.xyz (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.43 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=yoctocell.xyz header.s=mail header.b=CDDqsAH+; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=yoctocell.xyz (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: AE6EC219FE X-Spam-Score: -1.43 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: yZniSxzYwMCp --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, May 21 2021, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 07:08:49PM +0200, Leo Prikler wrote: >> @lfam: Does this patch look good to you? If so, can we apply it? > > I notice that (most of?) the new packages use native-inputs for their > dependencies. > > If these dependencies are used at run-time, I would propagate them > instead. This way, they will be available in the build environment of > packages that depend on the package that is using them, which matters > for our go-build-system, where everything is built from scratch in each > package. If I remember correctly, that is... I am not familiar with the Go ecosystem, is there a way to tell if a dependency is used at runtime? Sorry for the delay. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmC7zZQVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x514cP/iU3YE/2mIzPyrWEmROcYr2FF3Lb U84geR60dYiNYbGcWoBihjn5fbJSkTFEZjtltkaQU19vThFcWzhwa5Y6A2tKGsZX EUF5VXzSgEMQ/WJrozTdY2heIJMmVjiFOyOHdw+1r4H9Opvdv/wHSZ5VhzH69gJ9 bZXJcgXjNwSlnEaiiw43WsSUZYmuLYNJtNOFwXhqdi0wZ6cIdwB8ulktJ40KyOMk MD9h97ZLOXiedeLR9sXxC5SxosCZawIOY3W5+obbUiXu8CK6D3p4jYwq7B5YGmKZ q6vNuRQfS2BZZOS0noaQDWDIHtU2+bU22RbIXud2g1huGSXIsUHbeY2thUq/msV6 yvGdjFNp8QZ05kjlNy+bH+0U7fWStBqegfroxL87rkeIS3MNZ1rCFFWUON3jEEOe jLtcVHeGxdGV66jiamzOD8dEOkZ+mCOJwrxLPWlk1OaPqVgsC8iGs4vJmSye/oqx 2rorTePYmSE4R+3rxGaLjZc/V8pD0yYoo7nmR58WECV7M0TratWFvEBQvWGzkeeV BtvjWNrdZjJWvLOALdahAOz3qbs6tWYTF25PS5P/yFFWquLXynctQE+VHgmkMtJH XpxV8X7F1BP52+i9gvpGe/bz0ZEmak9DrP+FlTjyKr6/kgRWaobVvHIh0dK0ZwHd FoFiUCQh8osrYp5T =zAwF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--