bug#42141: blast+ is not reproducible

[Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>]

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 at 23:09, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>
>>> Fixed with commit 1ee2d117d8fa9e2e0d4ec46cc5555497bb5e6337.
>>
>> Yay!  Thank you!  And for my curiosity, how did I get the two build
>> farms to agree on an identical build, as reported in 'guix challenge'?
>>
>> That is odd.
>
> Because blast+ is multi-outputs and ’out’ is fine contrary to ’include’:
>
> $ guix challenge blast+:include
> /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include contents differ:
>   local hash: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x
>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x
>   https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: 0cakizfsqb1lla62cmwnng1h9gvqgf3lyjk0k7lkiaisj713mpzx
>   differing files:
>     /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h
>     /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h
>
> 1 store items were analyzed:
>   - 0 (0.0%) were identical
>   - 1 (100.0%) differed
>   - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive

Ah, thanks for explaining!

-- 
Ricardo