* Doing away with CentOS 6 support (Linux faux-2.6)?
@ 2023-12-07 22:46 Ludovic Courtès
2023-12-08 1:10 ` Ricardo
2023-12-08 16:54 ` Simon Tournier
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2023-12-07 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel, guix-science; +Cc: Ricardo Wurmus
Hello Guix!
We’ve been carrying a libc patch that allows us to potentially run
binaries on systems running the CentOS 6 kernel—a heavily-patched Linux
2.6 that resembles 3.0 but identifies itself as 2.6.32.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/patches/glibc-allow-kernel-2.6.32.patch
Back in 2018, this was deemed important for HPC clusters, where CentOS 6
was then relatively common, as Ricardo explained:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-02/msg00392.html
Five years later, it seems reasonable to drop the patch (which is likely
untested these days). If you disagree, now’s the time to make your
voice heard!
With the upcoming glibc upgrade in the ‘core-updates’ branch¹, glibc
would require Linux >= 3.2.0, as is already the case on ‘master’ if we
omit this faux-2.6.32 exception.
It’s still weeks, or perhaps months, before ‘core-updates’ is merged,
but the sooner we discuss this, the better!
Ludo’.
¹ https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67686
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Doing away with CentOS 6 support (Linux faux-2.6)?
2023-12-07 22:46 Doing away with CentOS 6 support (Linux faux-2.6)? Ludovic Courtès
@ 2023-12-08 1:10 ` Ricardo
2023-12-08 16:54 ` Simon Tournier
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo @ 2023-12-08 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 309 bytes --]
Hi,
On 8 December 2023 06:46:50 GMT+08:00, "Ludovic Courtès" <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> wrote:
>Five years later, it seems reasonable to drop the patch (which is likely
>untested these days). If you disagree, now’s the time to make your
>voice heard!
I agree that it's time to drop the patch.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 357 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Doing away with CentOS 6 support (Linux faux-2.6)?
2023-12-07 22:46 Doing away with CentOS 6 support (Linux faux-2.6)? Ludovic Courtès
2023-12-08 1:10 ` Ricardo
@ 2023-12-08 16:54 ` Simon Tournier
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Tournier @ 2023-12-08 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès, guix-devel, guix-science; +Cc: Ricardo Wurmus
Hi,
On Thu, 07 Dec 2023 at 23:46, Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> wrote:
> Back in 2018, this was deemed important for HPC clusters, where CentOS 6
> was then relatively common, as Ricardo explained:
Héhé! A colleague re-installed CentOS 6 this week; for testing
purpose. Hum… :-)
> Five years later, it seems reasonable to drop the patch (which is likely
> untested these days). If you disagree, now’s the time to make your
> voice heard!
Yeah, let drop this patch. Well, CentOS 7 will be soon end of life so
it seems very reasonable to drop patches for CentOS 6 only.
Cheers,
simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-08 17:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-07 22:46 Doing away with CentOS 6 support (Linux faux-2.6)? Ludovic Courtès
2023-12-08 1:10 ` Ricardo
2023-12-08 16:54 ` Simon Tournier
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.