From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id CAnSIVMAyWUl2gAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 18:13:55 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id CAnSIVMAyWUl2gAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 18:13:55 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=LhLUq7nS; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1707671635; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=IaAP9wAbB/Wz8RffTNUdORfdt8yzO1P0nrF1Rc2M3+g=; b=Yloy9bk4APrg84/iVFbILGuwBWuF6S2O7oEE6vRC5ks7jszvkpHXspMKxgfpjEmOEHHuz9 lrHu12R0QHPUM8a97TWNBEpGXrF8pCTp0smFMOjb88ruIcTQ14WTKq+dKzfryI2GTmxQLs OXIV0TyMvS7noSf+7Z7f4PNumM5+RgJS5XdbHpXJz/RmIGAFi6A68M+uRSwRd7f/SzBdIU nW2vXihaRFYPQAZM2pv2vtSo0G9TtqBs1EhJvbM6LvZuAiN3EDADRum6E9kM242gbl03Mn K9m1snPhshqZXr3j/9CZWnR3BzgNgzxOeKvB+zoc4xt2le7s3BO2lODiLojSZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=LhLUq7nS; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1707671635; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=u/6BxYMVj6K1YLKE8qzQD4RfbKJt/6kVFz0E0PWknxq05JK9G8JUjNgVEhkbvpYXRUAn2A 8RTh0D344fxFp/GHBctjqF9pRyu1lvh+Ku1UJjRiv2815qqsQUORcoOXFuagD+eMhLP1b8 kEQqFe+masGTJ1+FYTaiBym4nv3AndkjT9B/zvuc0KIaITRNSMg1TQA5YAmJTT365xW1cJ Xv+nrCf5ci6dTjxzIzm66qvg9Lx71C4wzP7GJ8uZRe4RwQBWGG5odCGkTgwEEuudHn6q2g 1qaeCXBgGaz84B1YWTMPMiQzsUVr21Q3K+EYawEgPKbcF7/GAOgVtbEwCpO3JQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61027215D3 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 18:13:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZChD-0006lp-Oz; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 11:28:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZChB-0006lf-Lb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 11:28:45 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZChB-0001BT-Dk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 11:28:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZChR-0006NV-M4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 11:29:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#66997: nar-herder uses 10 GiB of resident memory, 100% CPU on hydra-guix-129 Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 16:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66997 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christopher Baines Cc: 66997@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 66997-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66997.170766888824411 (code B ref 66997); Sun, 11 Feb 2024 16:29:01 +0000 Received: (at 66997) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2024 16:28:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58343 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZCgZ-0006Lf-Q7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 11:28:08 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2d]:57760) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZCgX-0006L3-CR for 66997@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 11:28:06 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-68c2f4c3282so12478326d6.3 for <66997@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 08:27:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1707668863; x=1708273663; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IaAP9wAbB/Wz8RffTNUdORfdt8yzO1P0nrF1Rc2M3+g=; b=LhLUq7nSEWmVxeNMBwkg0ivEwKfCyGYJyetYVntwJu0c/8sF2fWx3DS1Tpkjx6ANBA OdYUwyowoNGyCQn6fK2Y2NwcJLunGBb1aiJxsi5zcBnW5uu67czY1l05x+dZ8HEeiDN/ QyHGDsEW3amtfuWIC4a7PpBBUE22cvDMy8fsTeFBmoPyI05FWv/uYWv52QW+JgFLCAbR LbcDROFa+zJdrCOBUjjanapOb4eoTaWnmL5pBCa9lTjwDHtTaz6gCRX7ktlTdTiCS2fU 1HGeRGsgE7GkZjTW9ePeg4JX6QXu78vvbMmY5/s1hyKuMd+0hVzu8TjRhkdG9Rb12YtZ Sn4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707668863; x=1708273663; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=IaAP9wAbB/Wz8RffTNUdORfdt8yzO1P0nrF1Rc2M3+g=; b=qi245MHlCMTCo8eS/g6wkxHx1ywVHdzMgz2ViNzU/xD8hDIltwsoxdgEDlT4e/7pJB t83WjIljfag5oyfbhwd9Y4T0JdMIL4OWIQLCwPBliO+jh57zlRCtDYmhWTsnq22tbFAW MMCV5Sb2lfDCocQaicT4nw0975Gzs73OKTPJqQbbfd7vb8tBXvnnEaNpzXrGrtzIvgxT MzTO6uYMbUuRZv7Xl8GHlS/mviz+T8Io150c2AYEfcoA+sMx0Ekmusy+FwYJ32EBT/GQ yKhSZT9gpFHejurVo9KhS2Migob4F/kP/iIJ3gawhkvj3oiOUXTcG15yZJPLqg1sF155 V42A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxieKxP8RoB1OeqlrFphQba3gcD2S6oPuXY4cgaCrGllzM9l52+ d/AXHN+H5j3QRAC5OQM6Tg1H286lQ3SOQiGD9ZYwBKisBXUzHsa29eexAI17 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH/41toFetvRXYuZq+L2yW8XYx3UQJkcMoy8yxDGRv4S9+fB1+EdJbLzssJWA1eMpB+WWrLFw== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e24d:0:b0:681:937f:6e68 with SMTP id x13-20020a0ce24d000000b00681937f6e68mr4808655qvl.63.1707668863009; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 08:27:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-130-14.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.130.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ks23-20020a056214311700b0068c87402da6sm2824399qvb.14.2024.02.11.08.27.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 11 Feb 2024 08:27:42 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer In-Reply-To: <87il6cgsqw.fsf@cbaines.net> (Christopher Baines's message of "Wed, 08 Nov 2023 15:36:55 +0000") References: <87jzqshph2.fsf@gmail.com> <87il6cgsqw.fsf@cbaines.net> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 11:27:41 -0500 Message-ID: <87mss7vude.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Spam: Yes X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 9.32 X-Spam-Score: 9.32 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 61027215D3 X-Migadu-Spam: Yes X-TUID: 8HpDlk6GIckP Hi, Christopher Baines writes: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> I was looking at top on the hydra-guix-129 node, which runs nar-herder, >> and saw this: >> >> 4772 nar-her+ 20 0 28.9g 11.5g 100.0 6.1 55,55 S .nar-herder-rea >> >> 11.5 GiB of memory seems a bit excessive, no? Its cumulated processing >> time is also at the top of the table, and it seems stuck at 100% of CPU >> usage. >> >> Is this expected of the nar-herder, or has it gone awry? > > I think hydra-guix-129 was running an older version of the nar-herder, > so I've updated it and I think that's improved the situation. > > I've just reconfigured the machine to use a specific commit at the > moment, but it would be good to bump the commit that the Guix package is > using. The situation appears unresolved; c.f. `top' output on hydra-guix-129: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 62775 nar-her+ 20 0 903.7g 93.9g 0.0 49.8 22,44 S `- fibers 0 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- It's gobbled up half of the memory of the machine so far, and will probably keep growing slowly. Perhaps the machine should be reconfigured & rebooted, as its generation appears to be from Nov 23. It's been up for 41 days. -- Thanks, Maxim