From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id mGkkEYXYz2WnxAAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 22:49:57 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id mGkkEYXYz2WnxAAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 22:49:57 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1708120197; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=/UWvqgGQcjQhhE34hG3qnoNPodCGCsUp0a/G/QS/7hc=; b=aeCkBXKyvLIA9FdE5WfLMlXaGj8bMYX+pnyB24ZOCLzE1xK/+Y7es7QapcUQgavfnHk93j /vpz8ZFOO99BKGpFH4cmM4QVfyLqggr0Fx1bzlJgHO81uaLgknZxfutZ/H0CUZJEdITLIo Mh5mibJIQU0BFZF3zZ8zroD8GpauiF+vIWzO48bzBzepd/AFleL4TJCL2wJCdWIIh6Ig/o z5znNzZEmGGHj7uWJyvqaCdODK1PWUJrD2X/RqQEZG+5C5S9CisNXryARkwkeWmtgFUXZl f8BtveNtDLX0lHmy9P2PYeoAKCrcZWH+EHnuqmgLkrnZzJ4lQNV3mUNbtTb4Qg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1708120197; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=B+CpW1ZC/rO0Xe6HWE7FjotQiFKB5m1jh4I/IE9BUs44VDRm7lMWYnU5/uACoPg7UXV7Nt 5JpEFWm/YNbgVUkn7g0cOI5BX7jJQV7XsFUYGG9R8J553BU2wIyBBKgxbLQwKiT245/btC dVAfsDlDVWobGQVTOBdA8yS67GPkTJMWRbdq9JmAFqoObi/PMfLp7SwBZbZeQhlU+5ewZK XZGMn8Cny2xkNdzesguOuym0KfjpnBHVMXPSdJDxtOojLbdtIlfqv5wrT5zLdrtLsCA/Bd +r1E31lAcaAEceyYxMEk73HtS4V1JGUGr3vuWJyrltyonjBTv8/LrFrCW1qhMg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0701D71A47 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 22:49:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rb65Z-0007Gb-Sm; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:49:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rb65X-0007GA-C2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:49:43 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rb65X-00056P-2l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:49:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rb65q-0002yA-4j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#67512] [PATCH v4 3/4] gnu: Add wasm packages. Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 21:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67512 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur , Ian Eure Cc: 67512@debbugs.gnu.org, Liliana Marie Prikler Received: via spool by 67512-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67512.170812018211382 (code B ref 67512); Fri, 16 Feb 2024 21:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 67512) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2024 21:49:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60295 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rb65V-0002xV-Vc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:49:42 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:36998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rb65S-0002xF-Vm for 67512@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:49:40 -0500 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rb651-0004OG-2l; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:49:11 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver In-Reply-To: <877cj4fpo6.fsf@lassieur.org> References: <39662eaab8ebb73981be67f42a0277c2013be76b.1707855137.git.ian@retrospec.tv> <1808da259ee4755731fade4507812fb3f9ba619e.camel@gmail.com> <87eddgx6y7.fsf@retrospec.tv> <877cj4fpo6.fsf@lassieur.org> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:48:55 -0500 Message-ID: <87mss03wrh.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.01 X-Spam-Score: -3.01 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0701D71A47 X-TUID: CSaO6tjd9dwl Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: > On Tue, Feb 13 2024, Ian Eure wrote: > >> D. Fold the new (gnu packages wasm) into (gnu packages librewolf). This = is the >> only place they=E2=80=99re used, but it sounds like there=E2=80=99s desi= re to port some of the >> other firefoxen to this stuff, so probably not a good long-term option. > > Does Librewolf depend on the Wasm packages more than the other Firefox > based browsers? My point is that if your Librewolf package is > independent from the Wasm packages, they can be split and reviewed > independently. > > That would make the Librewolf review shorter and easier, and the Wasm > review more consistent and easy to test. Also, adding Wasm to our > Firefox based browsers would be a one-shot. (Of course it doesn't have > to be included in Icecat, but I think it would be great to have it in > =E2=80=98make-torbrowser=E2=80=99.) I'd like to have support for Wasm sandboxed libraries in IceCat as well. Thanks, Mark