From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id KC6VFPpoKmc+fwEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 18:50:34 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id KC6VFPpoKmc+fwEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 19:50:34 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b="aAu/pBPH"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=X7i85jOD; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1730832634; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=hC8CBG6aRKNeNo3BSYs8Tl36JL65UIWeIexCIj8qRZtGgkPchofi1LlwD8tmpDDZFG3ae2 PTWl78KdVwt5woDHoR8sLQfUuGk5wo6468RnYWoJPNdYk1IcHnZSyVk5fpko9yq8UEq/xe UFG6NKxcwJdjx8gRTGMbJ5BxKf3e61SlCHhagWsrAQjINwABVnCXpZiKBQHltZa05V0L2e yuMU5X648qDVH9Ocjsi+TKJyFRsBuFRAfYInMoJHevgdBZg2GNSzYTWBsg5+QjRwaBwjnx 6Vx0m3DqS0k+6Uf+laFgfj9ZMCgyWmr5PQRHN2UFQnqFjr9SPfJLIvAaCTlAAw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b="aAu/pBPH"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=X7i85jOD; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1730832634; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-to: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=521yasW/Gyz+BiX7JWakXcccDgsT+dUPTSLeFTUnHSQ=; b=D/Kq7U0T2FrKTMuArtfq4SPkhSlcyK719MGqO5dUH1bKrrAEDl4HGd41YIBRuA/5yQokZY N2UVJpoflLiXFs+As2GqShBRVMr3ZS0R1LSDmlxxOYpKW29Mjkpb1LuWfHMhIO5NuY0LB6 tT6xExb+1YdpyurHjpJpg2+/1pdxpiLaYurw2QMuo7BPzvqxLm6uuMCxQAqXDugERDZRgV lqemnW0u2OL665ERSOqHmqWmwWu5jNCj6Tg48Ln1NG3VjnljIGZjErwzhVthoWMDcUl+su wzUIJU8ukQslMmk46Utlr5IuybUb/Jxnvgj1OOOzqATfT4ctVoGRMmfs599Y9w== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05F768650A for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 19:50:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t8Ocv-0006p3-Vt; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:50:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t8Oct-0006kf-4M for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:50:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t8Ocs-0000SJ-RP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:50:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=521yasW/Gyz+BiX7JWakXcccDgsT+dUPTSLeFTUnHSQ=; b=aAu/pBPHZ2dacChBqjVe8ar/WEqxYtYAFAeUAAbTSDKIjtP2VN6k8JTPljThRPsvx0dRtdpUaBhv0y0GmMXjWCOCNBrUK38WKsJ3ZkdCeFVYftX5fvajGcLsxVuhxlg0wERh1dLOjTVa4+e9O1QRUc8Apwmiu8/Og5uO2eEbHRnatadtGlyGfQ7SU/CvdPpjHkIBgG2EHIiUxGYARC60xAIdqWaN4SJy987DmUQekjYYw7iYJ21VUGsuZEv0SZ75JMvc0fM/IV4OF+F1/av0EZ118+iTkuRIMaTOnj8MxKaQqF13853MZnyST/pu+4z5WtFqDsioJcgQC0Ag9N7N2Q==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8Ocs-0000fu-Ls for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:50:02 -0500 Subject: bug#73288: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: John Kehayias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 18:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 73288-done@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Josselin Poiret , Z572 , Efraim Flashner Mail-Followup-To: 73288@debbugs.gnu.org, john.kehayias@protonmail.com, john.kehayias@protonmail.com Received: via spool by 73288-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D73288.17308325632525 (code D ref 73288); Tue, 05 Nov 2024 18:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 73288-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2024 18:49:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37871 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8OcF-0000ef-8J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:49:23 -0500 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]:31513) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8Oc9-0000e9-Ty for 73288-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:49:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1730832551; x=1731091751; bh=521yasW/Gyz+BiX7JWakXcccDgsT+dUPTSLeFTUnHSQ=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=X7i85jOD343xa7sk7PLpZnIH1AjwLdF8nfoQPToBPyE4o0FTk597FiLMomS+KAsSg DP95IJeT2o0flqg6wFwCycUXVdCNxConmU0iPxMvlTsMSMX7NqR0HHMsMplFck+urX FgprY5PWXeAaPdwdt9KXt0yP1BizsDhgQtkAKOAZcIyc/SvvSl43qDxTQpT13Ub0tB 3bPTnNhmHIDCXepAzGFht6ikQy/cxVcUfSwwudRCx0Xtw2QcCuxfGCZ01anZaxcCIG NnqWIeQ1pkDIHXTuSMqqLKmnya15DjaVQtF5EJrAnpeW71rcZahdIn8xXSNCZZ09Hi EzQoreHE20z/w== Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 18:49:07 +0000 Message-ID: <87msida543.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87msifosdv.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> <87cyjck50n.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> <87zfmfafv6.fsf@protonmail.com> <87msifosdv.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 79fd9bbdcb606e65b23f3de5282f2dab1fa6a969 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: John Kehayias X-ACL-Warn: , John Kehayias via Guix-patches From: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.40 X-Spam-Score: -3.40 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 05F768650A X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: aeD+SzBExGrk On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 11:15 PM, John Kehayias wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 12:50 AM, Z572 wrote: > >> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 03:02 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 06:04:08PM +0800, Z572 wrote: >>>>> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: >>>>> >>>>> > Hello Guix, >>>>> > >>>>> > The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for >>>>> > merging. Besides some other fixes and updates, the main series is >>>>> > tracked at . There is an update = to >>>>> > add NVK support to mesa for x86_64-linux which I need to review and >>>>> > push (and rebase to get more fixes from master). >>>>> > >>>>> > Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as >>>>> > well on Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled ou= t >>>>> > on Bordeaux. Perhaps Efraim can chime in there. >>>>> > >>>>> > With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to ca= tch >>>>> > up again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of >>>>> > other blockers. >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks! >>>>> > John >>>>> >>>>> maybe is time to merge? >>>>> >>>>> see >>>>> ci have x86_64-linux 96.3%, i686-linux 87.7%, powerpc64le-linux= 85.5% >>>>> bordeaux have x86_64-linux 91.5%, i686-linux 77.8%, armhf-linux >>>>> 79.4%, aarch64-linux 89.0%. >>>>> >>>>> Is there anything else in the way? >>>> >>>> Comparing them against master and against each other: >>>> x86_64: comparable on ci, slight regression on bordeaux >>>> i686: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (91.8 -> 77.8) >>>> aarch64: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (97.0 -> 89.0) >>>> armhf: slight regression on bordeaux >>>> ppc64le: comparable on ci and bordeaux >>>> riscv64: regression on bordeaux (62.0 -> 28.2) >>>> >>>> I feel like bordeaux will catch-up fairly quickly post merge. However= , >>>> we do now have the regression page for bordeaux of master vs >>>> mesa-updates: >>>> >>>> >>>> However, after spot-checking a few of them to see if there are >>>> substitutes (including gnome and openjdk) it looks like it probably ju= st >>>> needs to be sent through again. >>>> >>>> It looks okay to me >>> >>> I had been keeping a close eye some weeks ago during the initial batch >>> of patches I pushed and I also think everything looks good. I was just >>> waiting for non-x86 substitute coverage which seems to finally be >>> there as noted above after waiting for other branches and recent >>> Berlin issues. I have been running my system on this branch for a >>> couple weeks as well. >>> >>> However, the other day on IRC there was a comment about (if I >>> remember) Sway hardware acceleration needing newer libva...? I think >>> it was Josselin (cc'ed); apologies if I misremembered as I was >>> traveling. >>> >>> Is that a blocker? If so, it would be good to have that update (plus >>> likely yet another mesa version bump) so substitutes can be >>> rebuilt. But I also don't want to hold up any other branches longer >>> than necessary as this has already been waiting for some weeks. >> >> i think we can merge this branch first, and setup a new branch to fix/up= date >> libva and mesa, people can use inferior to get have hardware >> acceleration package on new branch. WDYT? >> > > Yes, sounds good. I did a rebase and deleted/pushed to mesa-updates. > I'll check in about 12 hours and will do the merge assuming it still > looks good and no sudden issues. > > Ah, did find the log I missed about Sway, seems it will be for the new > version . So, I > will do the merge and then we can do a new branch for libva, sway, > etc. (and keep up with mesa). Probably will just put it in the queue > once build slots open up as I would like to (every time) keep it small > and quick to keep it from becoming harder to manage. > > Thanks all! > John Merged! Closing. Thanks all.