From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 00:24:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87li2bnwf9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20131002124146.GA15506@debian> <20131002180223.GA873@debian> <874n8zsc3c.fsf@gnu.org> <20131002205600.GA1680@debian> <20131002211808.GA26447@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRUvH-0008Dy-F9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 18:29:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRUvB-0000o1-9w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 18:29:35 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:51640) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRUvB-0000nx-32 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 18:29:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20131002211808.GA26447@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Wed, 2 Oct 2013 23:18:08 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > The attached patch yields a "working" brasero in the sense that it starts= ,=20 > shows all icons, and allows, for instance, to drag and drop files from the > kde file browser into an image to be created. Apart from that, many helper > programs (mkisofs, cdrecord etc.) are missing, so the program is of little > practical use... But we can still use it to advance our understanding of > gnome packaging! :-) Can=E2=80=99t it use GNU xorriso as the back-end? > And not to start a flame war, but I see it as a real incentive to consider > kde packaging... I think you=E2=80=99d encounter similar patterns there. Besides, while I have nothing against KDE (esp. if someone else does the job ;-)), I think we should support GNOME as it is somewhat related to GNU. > As a first step, for qt, I think we might need to get the cmake build > system working. Cyril, would you be able to make it work on x86_64, > potentially by disabling the failing test in cmake? Good news: the failing test no longer fails on x86_64! That could be a result of the =E2=80=98ldd=E2=80=99 fix in core-updates. Ludo=E2=80=99.