From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87li24vizs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20131002124146.GA15506@debian> <20131002180223.GA873@debian> <874n8zsc3c.fsf@gnu.org> <20131002205600.GA1680@debian> <20131002211808.GA26447@debian> <87li2bnwf9.fsf@gnu.org> <20131003110744.GB6327@debian> <1380905448.1869.11.camel@creek.rivers> <20131007201109.GA4754@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTIwG-0006aw-Kx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:06:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTIwB-0002ED-A9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:06:04 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:58677) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTIwB-0002E8-3h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:05:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20131007201109.GA4754@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:11:09 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 06:50:48PM +0200, Aljosha Papsch wrote: >> http://blogs.gnome.org/ovitters/2013/09/25/gnome-and-logindsystemd-thoug= hts/ > > The replies by the blog author to the comments are quite interesting from > a gnu perspective: > > "Don=E2=80=99t you realize that I am a GNOME foundation member and I am o= n the > GNOME release team?" (So this is not just a random opinion by a random > person.) > > "Anyway, it seems eventually GNOME will head to be systemd and Linux-only= ." That=E2=80=99s clearly a serious risk, something we=E2=80=99ll have to foll= ow closely. > This should imply that gnome would not be a gnu project anymore. It wouldn=E2=80=99t be the first time there=E2=80=99s a technical inconsist= ency among GNU projects. But at any rate, GNOME lives its own life, essentially independent of GNU. Ludo=E2=80=99.