From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Patch-shebangs phase and created binaries
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 17:54:09 +0100
Message-ID: <87lhntpmq6.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20141030124534.GB6721@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32774)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1XkyPa-0005fY-TG
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 11:54:00 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1XkyPU-0008NP-UP
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 11:53:54 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:43957)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1XkyPU-0008N9-Mr
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 11:53:48 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20141030124534.GB6721@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> (Andreas
	Enge's message of "Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:45:34 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> should the final patch-shebangs phase not include the generated output
> path (well, the bin subdirectory) in its $PATH?

It already does.

> In texlive I see lines such as
> patch-shebang: ./texmf-dist/tex/luatex/lualibs/lualibs-compat.lua: warnin=
g: no binary for interpreter `texlua' found in $PATH

(And the mention of $PATH in this message is misleading.)

> The file starts with=20
> #!/usr/bin/env texlua
> and texlua is a binary created in the texlive output (actually, bin/texlu=
a is
> a symbolic link to the elf binary bin/luatex).

Could it be that the symlink doesn=E2=80=99t exist yet at the time the
=E2=80=98patch-shebangs=E2=80=99 phase runs?

HTH,
Ludo=E2=80=99.