From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add smartmontools. Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:15:58 -0500 Message-ID: <87lhk65m1t.fsf@yeeloong.lan> References: <87zj8of9sy.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <87r3tzsoxm.fsf@netris.org> <87mw4nfp1p.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44329) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL4AA-0004nh-Ks for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:19:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL4A5-0002by-Fo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:19:10 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:42902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL4A5-0002bq-BL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:19:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mw4nfp1p.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> ("Taylan Ulrich \=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=5C\=22Bay\=C4\=B1rl\=C4\=B1\=2FKammer\=5C\=22\=22's\?\= message of "Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:48:50 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer=22?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") writes: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> Debian claims that the license is gpl2, not gpl2+. >> >> Please be more careful checking licenses. Debian tends to be very >> thorough about this, so a good method is to find the package on Debian, >> e.g. , select the appropriate >> package (preferably the same version or close to it) and then choose the >> "Copyright File" link in the right column. > > OK, thanks for the tip. However, both the README and individual source > files use the "or (at your option) any later version" phrasing. I > wonder why Debian marked it gpl2? Indeed, you are right, and Debian is wrong. Nevermind :) One more unrelated suggestion, while I'm at it: in the synopsis and description, I think it would be better to write "S.M.A.R.T." rather than "SMART". What do you think? Anyway, okay to push. Thanks! Mark