From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: bug#22276: .sig Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:50:56 +0300 Message-ID: <87lh85wu4f.fsf@gmail.com> References: <874mexi3bd.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1tjxbmk.fsf@gmail.com> <87io3ax5z2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG1o7-0007pg-GV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 04:52:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG1o3-00053L-FA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 04:52:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG1o3-00053H-BD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 04:52:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aG1o3-00026b-6B for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 04:52:03 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87io3ax5z2.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sun, 03 Jan 2016 12:22:41 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 22276@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2016-01-03 14:22 +0300) wrote: > Seems that the GPH repository given at > is now unreachable: > > $ cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anoncvs@cvs.gnupg.org:/cvs/gph co gph > cvs [checkout aborted]: connect to cvs.gnupg.org(217.69.76.56):2401 faile= d: Connection refused > > Incidentally, it=E2=80=99s DocBook, not Texinfo, so not convenient to ref= er to. > > We could refer to the GnuPG manual, but it=E2=80=99s very much a reference > manual and doesn=E2=80=99t introduce OpenPGP concepts. Yes, I think a reference to the gpg manual wouldn't help (I didn't find an answer to my question there) > It sounds like fixing this documentation issue is beyond the scope of > Guix; I agree. > on possible fix would be to revive the GPH, possibly converting it > to Texinfo and integrating it into GnuPG itself. It would be great, but I'm not a volunteer :-) --=20 Alex