From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Patchwork
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:33:17 +0200
Message-ID: <87lh3ighr6.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87pot4ab2a.fsf@gnu.org>
	<idjh9eg5w21.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net> <877ffch32a.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160510060233.GD1075@debian-netbook>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39193)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1b07mv-0006MY-6t
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 09:33:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1b07mq-0006iZ-Sm
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 09:33:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160510060233.GD1075@debian-netbook> (Efraim Flashner's message
	of "Tue, 10 May 2016 09:02:33 +0300")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:

> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 05:50:21PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> skribis:
>>=20
>> > I=E2=80=99ve submitted a patch to the mailing list (this time inline w=
ith =E2=80=9Cgit
>> > send-mail=E2=80=9D) and it appeared in the list.  Is there any way for=
 us to
>> > mark patches as committed via email (e.g. by commenting with something
>> > like =E2=80=9CPushed as cabba9e.=E2=80=9D) or does patchwork figure th=
is out
>> > automatically?  Or can only people with an account change the status,
>> > and only on the web interface?
>>=20
>> That=E2=80=99s a good question!  I *think* Patchwork can find out by its=
elf by
>> looking at the repository, but I don=E2=80=99t know exactly.  We=E2=80=
=99ll see.  :-)
>>=20
>> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>>=20
>
> The connman patches I've already committed are still listed as new on pat=
chwork,
> and I didn't see a way to manually mark them as done.

Apparently Patchwork can sometimes (I=E2=80=99m not sure exactly when)
automatically determine whether a patch has been applied; in other
cases, one must manually mark the patch as applied in the Web interface.
:-/

Ludo=E2=80=99.