From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: Add r-bigmemory-sri. Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:18:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87lgx4c1wj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a8dohd7q.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgx8jja2.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c18iF-0006f2-JR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 05:17:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c18iB-0007tG-Mq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 05:17:03 -0400 In-reply-to: <87lgx8jja2.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Roel Janssen writes: >> + (description "This package provides a shared resource interface for the >> +bigmemory and synchronicity packages.") >> + (license (list license:lgpl3 license:asl2.0)))) > > What does this list mean? > Also: is this LGPL3+ or LGPL3 only? The CRAN page lists LGPL3 explicitly, but that could be imprecise ... The source code package does not contain any other license indication than waht is stated in the DESCRIPTION file (which states LGPL3 and Apache Software License 2.0). See: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bigmemory.sri/ So, I think the only thing I can do is just follow what has been stated, which is LGPL3 (precisely this) and Apache Software License 2.0. WDYT? Kind regards, Roel Janssen