From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59233)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dLcKA-0003zk-Si
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 17:29:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dLcK6-0002Io-SF
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 17:29:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47281)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dLcK6-0002Ig-PB
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 17:29:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dLcK6-0003v1-Fl
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 17:29:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#27344] [PATCH 02/12] gnu: Add libctl.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27344.B27344.149756209615011@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20170612165226.1268-1-theodoros.for@openmailbox.org>
	<20170612165226.1268-2-theodoros.for@openmailbox.org>
	<20170615133246.3b00136b@scratchpost.org> <87mv992zaf.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170615161558.07fc986b@scratchpost.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 23:28:01 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20170615161558.07fc986b@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's
	message of "Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:15:58 +0200")
Message-ID: <87lgot2b6m.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: 27344@debbugs.gnu.org

Heya,

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:

> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:47:20 +0200
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote:
>
>> Hi Danny,
>>=20
>> Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:
>>=20
>> >> +(define-public libctl
>> >> +  (package
>> >> +    (name "libctl")=20=20
>> >=20=20
>> >>(inputs)
>> >> +     `(("guile" ,guile-2.2)))=20=20
>> >
>> > I think both the package name and the variable name should have a "gui=
le2.2-" prefix.=20=20
>>=20
>> Actually no.  :-)
>>=20
>> When Guile 2.0 was the default, I used the =E2=80=9Cguile2.2-=E2=80=9D p=
refix for
>> packages that were using 2.2 instead of 2.0.  Now most of them are
>> deprecated and I do the reverse: use the =E2=80=9Cguile2.0-=E2=80=9D pre=
fix for packages
>> that are still on 2.0.
>
> Oh okay.  But libctl should still have a "guile-" prefix, right?

If it's a Guile-only library, yes.

Ludo=E2=80=99.