From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Our package names should not include "github-com" Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:12:32 -0400 Message-ID: <87lgkfhszj.fsf_-_@netris.org> References: <20171013014334.17601.30718@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20171013014344.D813E20338@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e33W5-0006AV-Qm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:12:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e33W2-0007rC-Kg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:12:57 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:46442) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e33W2-0007r0-GU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:12:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20171013014344.D813E20338@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> (Leo Famulari's message of "Thu, 12 Oct 2017 21:43:44 -0400 (EDT)") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Leo, leo@famulari.name (Leo Famulari) writes: > lfam pushed a commit to branch master > in repository guix. > > commit 478ebb31a96955fc03fcea55a4432976ddb49319 > Author: Leo Famulari > Date: Wed Oct 11 20:22:32 2017 -0400 > > gnu: Add go-github-com-templexxx-reedsolomon. On this, and a great many other packages, you've included "github-com-" in the package names. I think this is a very bad idea. For one thing, we should not advertise, promote, or enhance the lock-in of GitHub, and this policy does all three. Sometimes a maintainer decides to change their hosting arrangements. When they do so, we should simply be able to update some URLs in one package definition. We should not have to do a global find/replace on the package name and alert our users to update their profiles and OS definitions. That contributes to lock-in. What do you think? Mark