From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Gerwitz Subject: Re: "guix-latest" differs when two users run "guix pull" from same commit Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 21:17:22 -0500 Message-ID: <87lghae7kd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ineaewkt.fsf@gmail.com> <87o9o2cikz.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv3fvuj7.fsf@gmail.com> <87zi6t1zci.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40693) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eY0Wv-0007Ss-9j for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 21:17:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eY0Wu-0003kK-By for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 21:17:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zi6t1zci.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Thu, 07 Dec 2017 22:57:17 -0800") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Chris Marusich , =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: help-guix@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 22:57:17 -0800, Chris Marusich wrote: > Chris Marusich writes: > >> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> >>> Chris Marusich skribis: >>> >>>> When two users run "guix pull" using the same commit, two different >>>> versions of "guix-latest" get built. This surprised me, and in any ca= se >>>> it seems inefficient to build the same version of Guix two times. Why >>>> do two different derivations get built? >>> >>> That=E2=80=99s a bug! :-) >> >> I see! Nice to know my suspicions were correct. > > Ludo, did you fix this recently? Anecdotally, I noticed that the > problem no longer occurs using a recent version of Guix. I still seem to have this issue. My workaround is to just manually symlink ~/.config/guix/latest to the same derivation as root's. Since Ludo said this behavior seems to be a bug, can I assume that it is safe to do so? =2D-=20 Mike Gerwitz Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer GPG: D6E9 B930 028A 6C38 F43B 2388 FEF6 3574 5E6F 6D05 https://mikegerwitz.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJaUYMzAAoJEIyRe39dxRuirzsP/jBljylQ9OlQ2edElcL1thBH BDoMrhpqVZoyl9oEH7Kltz0tREs+HXCkLP/EHY8I2lCb+TNa9mJNUl1wlTfS6MyN YGQrm/tDQBMLgx31nQ5uyRGfu7hRQAnIJ4GWjK/6SWcQVaBapE2yRmdMU5Q5oVr6 EcE+OLXRTsgX/xuwco27eoABIYHllFRwBaclZD/h/HzsxnjHuDq+M7SwCDieggzR bPTub2O2QW12yZRx94VbCHLq2+Bg2OUeIW4RmLVwIQmpB4grC5UDyZrCj0CZF29y V/dR9EjH8cXdxnJYPtqlOBs4ZZeDRH7lNmCgH/6tEJMHdJ1UV2pk8bg6txrlsu9m Qu1ikQG3qN4+ZhH8mwbCbVRTF4fA9Zs5Xx8WSlR8uQ6nWFjrBDiawNEAAbKHKQv2 48RAB8NAJl7dtB+Ax8RV2exsvcvSBjWot/JppeDzqRh4EUJsWKbuC7ThIX+UlL1s TWr5qmqPARo220yTnGNOUl+a1Jtyj3S3dDTGTrqeACiX/KhCIzh7IKaVNKj8kl/4 IsoFx60l5jg4x7bypc6caBf0tpo+yytCYL54geIDswaZSWFvtV8SAY0KP+GA1D+K 6Tif5e1vHf4w2A8px+v9J0J9khqufLJa5gbk7xYGFv4Q31Yvqz+BJpEfJ18v5A/g gD+fVIT8VUkLelcJzZ/j =6vBu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--