Re: 03/03: gnu: python-dateutil: Update to 2.6.1.

[Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1781 bytes --]

Alex Vong <alexvong1995@gmail.com> writes:

> Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au> writes:
>
>> On 31/01/18 16:18, Alex Vong wrote:
>>> Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi Mark, Marius,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 31/01/18 12:52, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> mbakke@fastmail.com (Marius Bakke) writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> mbakke pushed a commit to branch master
>>>>>> in repository guix.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> commit b94502bed69c0fb5033d702fd0308209efb8815c
>>>>>> Author: Alex Vong <alexvong1995@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Date:   Sat Jan 27 22:58:58 2018 +0800
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       gnu: python-dateutil: Update to 2.6.1.
>>>>>>            * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-dateutil,
>>>>>> python2-dateutil): Update to
>>>>>>       2.6.1.
>>>>> This seems to have broken 'python-pandas'.
>>>> 'python-pandas' on master needs to be updated to 0.22, but testing the
>>>> updated version requires adding further packages and doing a few
>>>> updates. I have been working on this (slowly) on 'core-updates' since
>>>> it requires updates to some of the more core python testing
>>>> packages. I have a draft set of packages
>>>>
>>>> WDYT about updating it on the master branch but disabling automated
>>>> tests until 'core-updates' is merged?
>>>>
>>> or maybe revert the python-dateutil commit for now? I don't think there
>>> is a package relying on the latest version of python-dateutil. I am
>>> going to package something depending on python-dateutil, but I think it
>>> should work on the older version of python-dateutil as well. WDYT?
>>
>> Sure, if you like.
>>  ben
>
> Oh, I forget to mention: to apply it to core-updates instead.

I reverted it on 'master' and will merge it to core-updates and add it
there shortly.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]