From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: core-updates, last call? Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 00:16:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87lgfr5hs6.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87zi4b744f.fsf@elephly.net> <20180214234721.4e9fe198@scratchpost.org> <87a7waodaa.fsf@netris.org> <87o9kq7gt9.fsf@elephly.net> <877eretkos.fsf@ngyro.com> <87sh9z6aqa.fsf@elephly.net> <87po536a3k.fsf@elephly.net> <20180217151800.GA32556@jurong> <87mv0761go.fsf@elephly.net> <877erbjshw.fsf@netris.org> <20180217202408.GA18836@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41451) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enBiq-0006zy-D9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 18:16:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enBin-0002Wa-O2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 18:16:48 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enBin-0002Kb-FN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 18:16:45 -0500 In-reply-to: <20180217202408.GA18836@jasmine.lan> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel Leo Famulari writes: > On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 03:00:59PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> > I=E2=80=99ll merge core-updates into master now. >>=20 >> Is that premature? There are still over 500 newly failed jobs on >> core-updates compared to master. >>=20 >> https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109914?compare=3D109912 > > Since GHC is still broken, I agree it's premature. But it=E2=80=99s not broken. Some of our messages crossed, but the latest status is that with my change to ghc-mtl we can build ghc-resourcet now. So GHC is fine and all of the Haskell packages are fine. We just didn=E2=80=99t start a new evaluation since then. > Otherwise, are there any in particular that count as "blockers"? > > We've been preparing this branch for quite a while and nobody has been > motivated to fix them... I don=E2=80=99t see any blockers any more. --=20 Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net