From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Guix support in cachix Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:09:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87lgaim3kz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871sck463k.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8lgf0o3.fsf@gnu.org> <87in5v84qo.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fdCzn-0008DV-Mt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 07:09:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fdCzm-0001qF-Ov for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 07:09:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87in5v84qo.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Wed, 04 Jul 2018 16:17:35 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, Marius Bakke skribis: > It looks useful for those who don't want to or can't publish their own > substitutes. And `guix challenge` makes it easy to verify the builds > coming from a particular "channel". I agree that it can be useful. I would very much like it if we had a solution that did not rely on a central service, though. If =E2=80=98guix publish=E2=80=99 could publish o= ver BitTorrent, say (or GNUnet, like we tried during GSoC a few years ago), that would be awesome. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.