From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 14:11:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87lg8o9hqu.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87ftyx35pw.fsf@lassieur.org> <87pny09rgo.fsf@elephly.net> <8736uw2q0g.fsf@lassieur.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39691) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fvLyA-0001nK-IR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:22:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fvLnZ-00085y-IW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:11:46 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21123) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fvLnZ-00085B-9E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:11:41 -0400 In-reply-to: <8736uw2q0g.fsf@lassieur.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Cl=C3=A9ment, >>> So the question is: can we push the Chromium package? I've read it's >>> almost ready[2]. >> >> The TODO list for convenience: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> * There is still some data transmitted when starting the browser for the >> first time. It seems related to the "domain_reliability" component. >> * Remove remaining "Web Store" links. Currently I've only found it in >> settings, under "accessibility" and "fonts". >> * Opening settings transmits a bunch of data, the next version will >> include the 'disable-translation-lang-fetch' patch from Inox. >> * PDFium is built, but does not seem to work (the 'install' phase >> probably needs tweaking). Might just disable it instead. >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> It would be *very* nice if the first and third items could be solved >> before merging, but I don=E2=80=99t consider them blockers. > > It's not clear to me :-) Does it mean we can merge? I=E2=80=99ll leave that up to Marius, because he is much more familiar with= the patch than I am. I would not object to merging it, but I=E2=80=99d like to see these TODOs as separate bug reports, with the first and third items at a higher severity than =E2=80=9Cnormal=E2=80=9D. -- Ricardo