From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Next browser finally on master! Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 22:02:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87lg521i8t.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <87in085kk2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <749b631e83d20f7a120a4c6dfc074a1a@riseup.net> <877egn3vke.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20181206093832.GA1601@jurong> <87y3923g84.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87y3921pkr.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87woom1pbd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50845) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gV0nD-0005Vz-6o for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 16:02:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gV0n9-000830-8E for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 16:02:43 -0500 In-reply-to: <87woom1pbd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Andreas Enge Cc: help-guix , Help-Guix --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I tried packing with --no-grafts to no avail. Then starting "./bin/next" y= ields in an infinite loop of "Polling platform port...", while there is a ".next-gtk-webkit" running in the background but it does not seem to work. Let's think this through together: "next" is a Common Lisp executable that = fires up a subprocess, "next-gtk-webkit" on startup. The sbcl-next package patches "source/ports/gtk-webkit.lisp" so that "*gtk-webkit-command*" points to the next-gtk-webkit input, an different bi= nary. When the "next" is run from the Guix pack, it starts succesfully because it= 's relocated. But the compiled-in *gtk-webkit-command* still points to the non-relocated next-gtk-webkit binary, which fails to start. Am I right her= e? If I am true here, then we've hit a big limitation of the Guix pack. Can a= nyone think of a way to handle this gracefully? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlwJjmIACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH9LowgAjejafy2tibqevtWxCM/PRsoB7viyFM4jSJmwy1RaacEVl79GhvjFh0Yr xO+VdzsPRqfamIwAKA+5GHO0DsekWJ9hNfbn2HOUJGfzULuhU4nNlnpOBRFOPj2h NoVW6qIezI3oImeD52aEbi5RMNMCgiTBPgjdwTKl8XsbMCiD5MOQXx7p24t+6kb3 i0nw0fOXGRYaTPvZjPHbtWH4xc6GXSU9Eoj3ottOtYedEUJeBcuIoO43fUDRzGQa j6ix3jGQqXsEdHdqi5naml1vOQyT+HhoxLG2UEhHMkKBiTd70T1PurL3MKTdL//F SEEcPp9gkqsY2u1LNZKl1F6aa61Hig== =xnSP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--