From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#33673: "guix system --help" does not detail how to use --on-error=strategy Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:10:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87lg4wyopd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pnuccuk2.fsf@gmail.com> <74aa65394c92165fbf4c2f777099eab3@riseup.net> <2a004926090617e0227252136dc35dab@riseup.net> <87ftv7623k.fsf@gnu.org> <20181211071841.GC1323@macbook41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54083) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWlZ2-0000Y3-FJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:11:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWlYu-000592-Ea for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:11:16 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWlYj-00055k-Vr for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:11:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gWlYj-0000qd-Pg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:11:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20181211071841.GC1323@macbook41> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:18:51 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: swedebugia@riseup.net, 33673@debbugs.gnu.org Hi! Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 12:16:47AM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: [...] >> Improvements are always welcome of course. The main criterion would be >> to remain consistent with the rest of Guix and with GNU conventions that >> we follow. Maybe it=E2=80=99s best to discuss what you have in mind fir= st? >>=20 >> Thank you, >> Ludo=E2=80=99. >>=20 > > I'd go with (one of: nothing-special, backtrace, debug) > with the assumption that for more information the manual is more > verbose. Sounds good to me. Would you like to send a patch? > I also just noticed that we have 'man guix-system', which could be more > verbose on the subject without needing to fit in a concise output. Manual pages are generated from the =E2=80=98--help=E2=80=99 output, the ca= nonical documentation being the Info manual. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.