From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: bug#33676: GuixSD on eoma68-a20?
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 14:04:58 -0500
Message-ID: <87lg4qa9vu.fsf__22627.4954657585$1544900715$gmane$org@netris.org>
References: <68f9fc17-94f5-dcc2-f54d-61d6e2bf384d@riseup.net>
	<20181208181214.2308472a@scratchpost.org>
	<20181209215126.GA10968@jurong>
	<20181210113014.0e4e76eb@scratchpost.org>
	<20181210211224.GA7317@jurong>
	<20181214215026.66ac1df2@scratchpost.org>
	<20181215102906.GA4621@jurong>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35152)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gYFHH-00006K-1P
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 14:07:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gYFHD-0000En-1y
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 14:07:06 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45376)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gYFHC-0000Ec-Sh
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 14:07:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gYFHC-0007Yc-Dc
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 14:07:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33676.B33676.154490076828987@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181215102906.GA4621@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Sat,
	15 Dec 2018 11:29:06 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 33676@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Andreas,

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 09:50:26PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
>> can you check whether dirindex (hashtables for directory) is enabled?
>> # tune2fs -l /dev/... | grep -o dir_index
>> See also https://blog.merovius.de/2013/10/20/ext4-mysterious-no-space-left-on.html
>
> It was, and I disabled it. Hopefully this does not break anything...

Why did you disable it?

> But does this not mean a big performance hit on /gnu/store/.links?

I would expect disabling dir_index to be a big performance hit on Guix
systems, and especially those with a large store, such a build farm
master nodes.

      Mark