From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: 01/01: tests: docker: Run a guest guile inside the docker
	container.
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 00:04:58 +0100
Message-ID: <87lg3gp7tx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20190115111739.3607.13533@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20190115111740.4E2CA20537@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<87h8e72afo.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53214)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gkzfi-0005aM-9Y
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 18:05:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gkzfh-0000aM-Fm
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 18:05:02 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:37288)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gkzfh-0000Yz-6c
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 18:05:01 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87h8e72afo.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 17
	Jan 2019 17:20:00 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hi Mark,

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> skribis:

> This introduces a duplicate field initializer in the expanded 'package'
> object, because the 'dummy-package' macro introduces its own
> 'build-system' field initializer.  From (guix tests):
>
>   (define-syntax-rule (dummy-package name* extra-fields ...)
>     "Return a \"dummy\" package called NAME*, with all its compulsory fie=
lds
>   initialized with default values, and with EXTRA-FIELDS set as specified=
."
>     (package extra-fields ...
>              (name name*) (version "0") (source #f)
>              (build-system gnu-build-system)
>              (synopsis #f) (description #f)
>              (home-page #f) (license #f)))

I realized I must have used the same idiom in some of the unit tests.
Did you catch anything there, Mark?

Ludo=E2=80=99.