From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Testing needed for lzip substitutes! Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 12:35:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87lfy89zqi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <87ftopg23r.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnnrf2tc.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34209) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hae7V-0000Ip-KF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 06:35:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hae7U-0007iV-In for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 06:35:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pnnrf2tc.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ping! :) I haven't run built packages much recently, but any idea what could be wrong? (Assuming there is anything wrong and it's not just me.) =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlz/g9UACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH97PwgApL0p91+2SoF82sDHpN18M842PmnuuiV6UdoHyf4BHnmsgmsyYVmrgW3a AtZBXi8xlygfH4Zr346FtnNsz+zvvh+YQSsbUiIRUxmSDU/xpsiH5nCshD6RNMJY DflTZ7VG9a6r7U2N5wkEGWUFRe+tWK/eLy2erBs7NFw0zqNRSddF417+HiJrpVQb Y0Yurq0si7P+MhO5taD4aw/ZooXLdPgN+TZe7DpS+InYq9hesM5lFWSvfH2Qlshq vQcxL5Cy8PMYDP+yIcICvSIOfQKIii97+qRZFD9SneKOzm6j4Rl7nxwCAbLNjEqK a8r9n8ILTGWxn25kP9MfcV/TnOWCng== =GL5+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--