From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 13:17:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87lftvcwr1.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87ftk4hbhu.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhibiqka.fsf@gnu.org> <8736g3k4hd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHnUU-0003WP-Vz for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 07:17:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHnUT-0000vl-8V for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 07:17:18 -0400 In-reply-to: <8736g3k4hd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: Guix-devel , Jesse Gibbons , GNU Guix maintainers Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Unfortunately GNU maintainers have having this discussion on private >> mailing lists. > > Why? Private GNU mailing lists have existed for years. They are currently being used for discussing this (and they were in use before that). This doesn=E2=80=99t mean that all GNU maintainers are happy with having discuss= ions on private lists. -- Ricardo