From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36828) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1izroR-00054P-21 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 19:48:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izroP-0002Cx-TR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 19:48:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izroP-0002Cr-LT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 19:48:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1izroP-0005Ke-JE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 19:48:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#39384] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-rg. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87v9oqrr0q.fsf@lafreniere.xyz> <878slmc640.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pnexrrwf.fsf@lafreniere.xyz> <20200202184757.GH9517@E5400> <87o8ugs5fu.fsf@lafreniere.xyz> <20200204095851.GA19864@E5400> <87mu9xspd0.fsf@lafreniere.xyz> <87lfpg4t3t.fsf@devup.no> From: "LaFreniere\, Joseph" In-reply-to: <87lfpg4t3t.fsf@devup.no> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 18:47:23 -0600 Message-ID: <87lfpfrzok.fsf@lafreniere.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 39384@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner , Nicolas Goaziou Marius Bakke writes: > "LaFreniere\, Joseph" writes: >> Ah, I see what you mean now. But wouldn't hard-coding the path >> to >> ripgrep in that way prevent the package from being able to use >> remote systems' ripgrep binaries when running over TRAMP? > > Perhaps we could patch [emacs-rg] to do both? Use the store > prefix if it > exists, and fall back to searching in PATH? What would be the advantage of that over just searching PATH to start with? -- Joseph LaFreniere