From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 0BafLvCywV4JCgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 21:56:00 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id iMuGKvCywV7dPAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 21:56:00 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8027D940146 for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 21:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42658 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaRGJ-0000oG-ES for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 17:55:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33348) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaRDh-00005v-JG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 17:53:19 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaRDh-000471-9j; Sun, 17 May 2020 17:53:17 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=35928 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jaRDg-0003BZ-Kk; Sun, 17 May 2020 17:53:17 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zimoun Subject: Re: Exact same 'call-with-temporary-directory' defined twice? References: <87wo5pi2yn.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 29 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 23:53:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Wed, 6 May 2020 16:58:26 +0200") Message-ID: <87lflqmdo5.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: UQb2JgOBMW40 Hi, zimoun skribis: > On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 15:54, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> > The comment in guix/swh.scm says ';FIXME: factorize'. Does it means: >> > move it in the file 'guix/utils.scm'? >> >> I believe the (shameful) reason is that the closure of (guix swh) is >> imported no the build side and adding (guix utils) to it would pull in >> too much stuff. > > I see... thank you for the explanation. > > Naively: does it make sense to move it to "guix/build/utils.scm"? No because it depends on (guix build syscalls) for =E2=80=98mkdtemp!=E2=80= =99 and there=E2=80=99s currently that assumption that (1) (guix build utils) can be used on a statically-linked Guile, and (2) it has no dependencies. Ludo=E2=80=99.