From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6EXKG/WJlmDzpAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 08 May 2021 14:54:13 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id wNtbF/WJlmAJMgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 08 May 2021 12:54:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C963B14B77 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 14:54:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48538 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lfMTC-0000Ev-Ky for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 08 May 2021 08:54:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lfMT6-0000Ee-2j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 08 May 2021 08:54:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lfMT4-0008SL-Bo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 08 May 2021 08:54:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lfMT4-0000yz-Av for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 08 May 2021 08:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#48214: inetutils-1.9.4 build fails Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 12:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48214 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Bone Baboon Received: via spool by 48214-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48214.16204784303771 (code B ref 48214); Sat, 08 May 2021 12:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 48214) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 May 2021 12:53:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50144 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lfMSh-0000yl-7z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 May 2021 08:53:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44472) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lfMSf-0000yd-6Y for 48214@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 May 2021 08:53:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lfMSY-00088E-8U; Sat, 08 May 2021 08:53:30 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=60698 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lfMSX-0001LR-Qp; Sat, 08 May 2021 08:53:30 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87a6pbjlao.fsf@disroot.org> <871ramoogd.fsf@nckx> <87eeekiq76.fsf@disroot.org> <87zgx7hpy0.fsf@disroot.org> <87tunfhjiy.fsf@disroot.org> <87eeejd1kx.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf8rgy60.fsf@disroot.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 19 =?UTF-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 229 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 14:53:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lf8rgy60.fsf@disroot.org> (Bone Baboon's message of "Thu, 06 May 2021 20:55:35 -0400") Message-ID: <87lf8p8jzr.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 48214@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1620478453; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=CLPqlPNyhxd4EYHspImjgx34550P8xMpS+GJbF4Ul4o=; b=f20KND1+87+RvL8g1mDfOBYIpDR4HO1YHEUGVDsf1GCQGlda9PW+lA0VMfDduO1SGGphKX Dg3ib2WvF50oWuTLjkPhEc/mmW6KFWTrjZH6/bQbfPmeIQe1pm4wHQDMQcFyV86S3JtPdN Pci5geMYPkQ8SLtzXgmWoTyUvEpHqQgoiZq4y51KBplOPVielphnhOlt7buIu7zt+9TK41 nEYpQIfW7HH8Pk21Ww8x3yxp22u6QUdVBiupqNgQ8v4KaqIzlafMu5Jfy+tHS2W4pwX0Rx NqrzwBNjemtBai7I83DK+cPePNQJqcOH/h5uXO55RtYGGwS8vuLe5DljNiKUWw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1620478453; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Zsuc3p/P3VN1OBMdPqAqWpbfe7e5a90msLUjuFfjhwscfcI9Ex1gmwiJ4IMmqj7AGyPtOE NlyTzN1eYcl4xR9HbpTkOMriNl7JnfYJV3TY7qlQFBWJvO770Qy+AxaIGfLrHGsV5zsrtF swNYMNs4Hj75qNLJ6zyUz3dFg+qKBrbEKHAx/DYCmCfbYdpu7pBn9YbQCVU6k+rWXqKpL9 KfbtYfyNvz+b/IaVBm21t9sDJWkMldV0l9x7bxkAlT+hk2Xf0j0l3j7ioaRJM1OL879421 0n5BNgRAXPdI83F96kl97BSXGmCqHDykx5pu5sP/j1VVknMTuQ5xKTlfWy3ZdQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.95 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: C963B14B77 X-Spam-Score: -2.95 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: QSBdApuNrSDx Hi, Bone Baboon skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >>> How can I use a package definition from core-updates with guix build or >>> in a system configuration if it is not available on Guix's master >>> branch? >> >> You can do better :-), you can install 2.0 from master like so: >> >> guix install inetutils --with-latest=3Dinetutils > > Thank you for sharing that command. > > I prefer to build locally over using substitutes. When I try to run > `guix build inetutils --no-substitutes --with-latest=3Dinetutils` it does > not complete because there is an interactive prompt. The prompt says > "Would you like to add this key to your keyring > ''?". I have a substitute server that is > sequentially building packages unattended and this would cause it to > become stuck and make no further progress. The interactive prompt is about authenticate the source code tarball, inetutils-2.0.tar.gz. It does not relate to substitutes. >>> On the inetutils mailing list it was suggested that I try inetutils 2.0 >>> on the core-updates branch. I can successfully build inetutils 2.0 from >>> the core-updates branch even with IPv6 disabled. >>> >>> What is the purpose of the core-updates branch? >> >> The =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 branch contains updates to core packa= ges and core >> Guix functionality that entails a rebuild of all the packages. In that >> branch we put package upgrades that would otherwise lead to too many >> rebuilds (info "(guix) Submitting Patches"). > > Thank you for explaining this. > > --- > > What is the process for a package to be brought into master from core-upd= ates? Submitting a patch the usual way, but making it clear in the subject line that it targets =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. > I would rebuild all the packages on my system if I could use inetutils > 2.0. Is there a way that I can rebuild all the packages I am using that > depend on inetutils to use inetutils 2.0 (or more generally any newer > version of package from core-updates)? You could maintain your own branch where the default inetutils is 2.0. >>> Can the Guix master branch provide inetutils 2.0 instead of 1.9.4? >> >> No: =E2=80=98guix refresh -l inetutils=E2=80=99 shows that almost 2,000 = packages depend >> on inetutils. >> >> That said, if needed, =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99 could provide 2.0 in addi= tion to 1.9, as >> is done for GDB for instance. > > Would having multiple versions of inetutils in master also create > multiple versions of packages that depend on inetutils for example a > version of isc-dhcp that depends on inetutils 1.9 and another that > depends on inetutils 2.0? No; what I suggest above would just address the case where people run =E2=80=98guix install inetutils=E2=80=99 or it could change the one in /run/current-system/profile. > Not having inetutils 2.0 in master appears to break how I connect to the > internet using Guix if I do both of these: > * Disable IPv6 > ** See my previous email in this thread that explains the rationale on > why I am disabling IPv6. > * Build from source > > isc-dhcp fails to build because it depends on inetutils 1.9 which is > failing. I am using isc-dhcp when I connecting to the internet. Unfortunately I don=E2=80=99t have a good solution for you. :-/ We could change isc-dhcp in =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99 so that it depends on = inetutils 2.0, but that looks like a band-aid. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.