From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id gAUoL74V9GNQAgAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 01:52:14 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id uFJsLr4V9GPQZwEAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 01:52:14 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4932537A44 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 01:52:14 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=Ws1C0FwM; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1676940734; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CihWzPVWtOwLLjHIyeRzHc+bplKLGCcJbU5AbUB7gsXP72om5qBJq43DGhBpEU+u9rF7tH ukBN8R2J7rfqmPlzAlFwDURjkXNGU1ycW7FJdW87UGS5fuFYdow1+PCE/VT/Swbb2qfcA4 2pnKJqqKofq50TKTAeZuRStmuvE0pUWV5bh648cygbO5WuaD3yvAYO1DXM14L3gMXssvAB YwhwefYSD81OH47ZlWubxkm6rg7fPDTzWoD0MJ1cbH4YtqATMBNNx8dNcLsDTelw/GIni7 Z4gxHQXGLXZmnN1A59gTATiYTiSNZ3j0jOYehbYlpcuNqlGIMJ25Rfw0eqpJjQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=Ws1C0FwM; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1676940734; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=kDW2PJY7LocWfz6wLWQhdRp+f2QCFyD154aXUuOIKBc=; b=CDBPjFaM8IPd5ZCkYtIUB/14wP/wwWBAMNNjSxSVb6HqLdpNLFr8xdSBXKPtLReO7Cm7WG S92gt3cYFb6pPdyZxcueaKqJjY33QZUGaSOqpljyuVX7Jk9izB1P0GN07QdVyAYI/7V+ch X/wKStXfq15g26xQlWJCFGW77jtpts4nsHPcLtEUHO5oanmliCGGLRCaiICy4GPB2AKp8T uCYD9s2CY+rZ3qztP84EvtaXMRCcsrn+ARNVYpVz5PBYC5uib3E83SnxHrgN27COveALvK jDITydx1JLG0Bcd0NEQGyF2pZyDdbJcxy61VF40qjOoN7+Xx6wO73UyDiwQZiw== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGt2-0005qR-0d; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:52:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGt0-0005q7-M4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:52:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGt0-0000fg-47 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:52:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGsz-0003PA-Oo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:52:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#54944: guix pull hangs on 32 bit Resent-From: Csepp Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54944 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Csepp Cc: 54944@debbugs.gnu.org, maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer , 54944@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.167694068313020 (code B ref -1); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:52:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2023 00:51:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGsN-0003Nw-Bs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:51:23 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:35768) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGsK-0003Nj-T6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:51:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGsK-0005nD-Mf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:51:20 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUGsI-0000YO-IV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:51:20 -0500 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PLLM864mbzDqnX; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:51:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1676940676; bh=zl8/NGqbatfO66v2O0l2tny6k1d85m9a3hcz9G3bGVI=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=Ws1C0FwM/3nEnQV7QXFPrYme1WZeZu7BJ9G3b3cE9XRQ3LjdIgkheCW7Cpjqo350b Ola2RmCc8Hl3EeNXiuwt7WWbe0shu9wYmNfQnQl3YAngI03JBlxRGZWzFugpP/P94/ sr2N8JwUdPhE/Nq6d21RdgLbhEqvYgq4O1I4PufY= X-Riseup-User-ID: F0E2771F8E2F1E11F9344DD39B24646456FA794F2E26BF9D6EB89A357879334E Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PLLM80tMJz5vpg; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:51:15 +0000 (UTC) References: <20220415020828.00b7865c@riseup.net> <87czfikio4.fsf@gmail.com> <87k03cndha.fsf@riseup.net> <87pma3x359.fsf@riseup.net> From: Csepp Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 01:50:20 +0100 In-reply-to: <87pma3x359.fsf@riseup.net> Message-ID: <87lekrx2m9.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4932537A44 X-Spam-Score: -2.05 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.05 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-TUID: TyTb9Q0VeIDj Csepp writes: > Csepp writes: > >> Maxim Cournoyer writes: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> raingloom writes: >>> >>>> It's been at 67% on guix-packages-base for at least an hour now. The >>>> system itself is responsive and with the swap I gave it, it has more >>>> than enough memory. Htop shows three guile processes at the top of the >>>> list when sorted by CPU%, their states are S, D, D. >>>> Both CPUs are practically idling. >>>> This looks like some kind of lockup to me. >>>> >>>> Fresh install based on bare-bones example on a 32 bit netbook, but the >>>> install image used is the latest tagged version, since apparently there >>>> is no 32 bit option for edge. >>>> >>>> I also tried pulling using channel-with-substitutes, since I'm not too >>>> keen on locally building everything on such an old machine. Although >>>> Guix itself should frankly not take this long to build if we want to be >>>> competitive with other distros. Anyways, pulling with that in >>>> channels.scm gives a cert related error, so that's great, means old >>>> images can't easily be used for installation. >>> >>> Have you been able to reproduce this? If so, could you share the commit >>> you are starting from and the CPU architecture, so that we may hopefully >>> reproduce too? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Maxim >> >> CPU architecture is x86, commit it happened on last time is 347733b. >> Other possibly relevant factors: >> * spinning rust storage >> * 1GB RAM >> * encrypted BTRFS root >> * 4GB (encrypted) swap >> * 128MB zswap >> >> The last was not there when I originally submitted the bug. >> >> The swap is relevant because if it's a timing issue it's very possible >> some part of the code assumes reads are almost instant, which is not >> true with swap, and delaying a read might be exposing a race condition. > > Happening again. > pulled to: 8320c0c > pulled from: 4501a50 > > Same system. > > The system version is from november of last year due, because trying to > upgrade takes so damn long and often gets stuck on some package with no > substitute. > So... the situation is not great... The process status says sleep so it's probably hanging in a syscall? Maybe a kernel bug?