From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id iBlRHCOl1GYUPAAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2024 17:32:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id iBlRHCOl1GYUPAAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2024 19:32:19 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=aVnhHRB2; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=mCdg5nnE; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1725211939; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=0yQhqpKTja/Nzf9Ixh07XYMzThY7yOdsv9p4CjFLvE8=; b=un0joI7UBdbgvt+fm+8K3C444nioUljVJQQmbpaETDpxHcoCiXfG9IMKCrsL7YrJcFdaDx VJ12CUzQ3QH+pVZG9dLosLheofKRGuV4af2xv3p41NcoTy3lUZa1NHBG26shZX1/rUdND4 rTCMfs3XejdW7IRDYTcnhMvEvuSzgiUPJyZCY0F/DNWT7bAOMPRiy0lc1DOM59QT1Y3+H3 +cclihZNT4RiVQB430yVladZgpq43guVUKQPHXbrmXu8NsZFQqPIra4ByvTq7jrWy4FxLe jM0lEfOwXt98/TbkQv1R5I4u6IKWoUI+LVF69dC39qc1HK/+n4pzdMxe+jAWzw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=aVnhHRB2; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=mCdg5nnE; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1725211939; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=oAo2m9w2lUbAnwyAIDx3mV2aO045Zmj8YEtj4Hiaw4FIPeL7fK2pGuXhuoHmGjQ1S5D5Zr 8wtvq7Z+jMNGN1h+qXu1E5LQjrbFd4Gfy8abgCtaEymbAi2OJsDvNWydLpj13pGuCcStil Owqcn3b2zjYHMkqwAe+CLzyvsFXFb4anxupjBAr0XxGv0xV3eX0gChzu4nlp3NqTdsPv0a OwyTZuY5emKLejSzx/IVwlO4VxPMOuQmyxDUcMcVhgOOyak8VcydBg6iU0UmSt2HRzcwS0 qefuhgxAnYsREcPVXoFJaYKmBNf8yyGcZ9d/01s3CxdMEu+aTnUFTIa4XVTWZg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28921170A3 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 19:32:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1skoQl-0003VU-TD; Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:32:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1skoQk-0003VK-9q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:32:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1skoQk-0000nm-0p for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:32:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=0yQhqpKTja/Nzf9Ixh07XYMzThY7yOdsv9p4CjFLvE8=; b=aVnhHRB2jSEipqTmekmVrA8z8zxvQ8+bYqv6mg3Dmg1r9vop7NDSCjHT1l7Hy+Iu8Wocw1rsy8mHcVBZDUs9ugp3Dqbg0vO4aFFB1+uwgZcNRpf/qiMyg9/yFXgE2vWK9NM9cw0QBRW/Es3irBF/qBqLDVx5aDB6Ve0QRZABSGa6eNfeDHUaHzsshl0dSYKmHQqgTB15kYbcu5JSJQoedsxkCwEFDY+pa+R9jxpzJdsZbLAoADY/Em5q7uyFXIzZodzGilQBcUd6bMjpNbGffVQUDxRJSB1CZWdcNi6KYPurcymI6iq6i4649ciwn4a8ydiZss7pxy7+qvxWfCB5Bg==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1skoRh-0007lt-NH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:33:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#72183] [PATCH] gnu: guile: Update to 3.0.10. Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 17:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 72183 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "Thompson, David" Cc: 72183@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 72183-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B72183.172521196529840 (code B ref 72183); Sun, 01 Sep 2024 17:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 72183) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2024 17:32:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38184 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1skoRR-0007lE-1L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:32:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44018) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1skoRO-0007kt-90 for 72183@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:32:43 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1skoQL-0000kJ-1O; Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:31:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=0yQhqpKTja/Nzf9Ixh07XYMzThY7yOdsv9p4CjFLvE8=; b=mCdg5nnEtfOGt3vJ+xIf NKO+avj5UY3jm9Jmq9Ik8wkDwOVgYsus9m1SLM9If999jGEOVMJtyDfpLqApWmJrEh0xRt6PSij1R geVxs3d4C2wSxSsTrb36dFZTFd5EFiJM6fWBYAZpFJve/UJr2M1B7HfooFWyD0XCfrGiSLuohuq8q JbR/i54A6f/v4G6iRknQ+tm/1qO1BbSr2O62UH30FYVQtyNbPNWJhpVMNZaDMRrjiZLpvudzvKY+r BxD4XsVHfUI/VHa3BSURYMx+0ANT49+YS2ob5exAvfLhW2WoeSpAT+z9CqhC+Ni7JLmGh/2VJPxfX dEC2iS4e1Ik4Tw==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: (David Thompson's message of "Fri, 19 Jul 2024 18:07:17 -0400") References: <87zfqds5pv.fsf@gnu.org> <874j8lru82.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 19:31:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87le0bcmbs.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 28921170A3 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -9.08 X-Spam-Score: -9.08 X-TUID: kFl9z2CjSF8L Hi David, "Thompson, David" skribis: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 4:40=E2=80=AFPM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> I temporarily reverted the commits that upgrade Guile and adjust Hoot in >> 31244f5cefae4c14a1a5d441dc3b3626b5f32abc so we can investigate the issue >> below (which broke =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99) without pressure. > > Oh no, sorry! I ran 'guix pull' after pushing these commits and didn't > experience issues so I thought all was well. :( No worries, I didn=E2=80=99t expect that either. >> Turns out =E2=80=98guile-3.0-latest=E2=80=99 is used to build Guix itsel= f (via =E2=80=98guix >> pull=E2=80=99, but also the =E2=80=98guix=E2=80=99 package) and this cau= se a failure of >> guix-cli-core.drv: > > How about using guile-3.0 for Guix so that future Guile updates can be > done without fear? We can do that, though I like the idea of following Guile closely. [...] >> Note that =E2=80=98bytevector->hash-data=E2=80=99 comes from Guile-Gcryp= t, which was >> itself still compiled with 3.0.9. So there=E2=80=99s a possibility that= the bug >> comes with this particular combination as is exhibited by cross-module >> inlining. > > Yup, that certainly sounds like what is happening here. Cross-module > inlining + the new keyword args optimization. I came up with a reduced test case and reported it here: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72936 Another problem I had forgotten is that Guile current =E2=80=98main=E2=80= =99 and 3.0.10 fails to build on 32-bit platforms: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72215 The best course of action might be to release 3.0.11 with bug fixes for at least these two things. WDYT? In the meantime, I keep using the Guile channel, which works well for me: (channel (name 'guile) (url "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git") (branch "main")) Ludo=E2=80=99.