From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id cJu5HCV92WYJRwEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 09:43:01 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id cJu5HCV92WYJRwEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:43:01 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b="FVK1/ier"; arc=pass ("zohomail.com:s=zohoarc:i=1"); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1725529381; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=IctdJszUa1JKLFKPkQxN5pCR+/TameiCin27gWp1gFA=; b=X9ZaxcByWIroHh5J+MsQ66hrET7wzwJVObicVXDbDJHltjWA95QsCXTiFoJ06F2XD7Dq3b nklVm3MNZryeJtFePKoGkAcnmS+jAulOdMeiXNRVpYSkdXF+46dK+jyklEfJDdrzmEZ6/o RRRTFDkm5T148AZhOMk7J+QqoxklpNnbvnMnKO+16StvXSOkT/+e+xWEdOjJGaAvt2kKbc CdfUndPYZFUPnOG96Ij8euZ9so8416kaxfSkkVvRqiGy2GckxZ5MrS8F8qjoECJymS6V5u /2IIjyLQNToV0k8wTHyKznlk2Ssd4V6VkDxWxGeySTTMvW5MYsO8dAi5ifTO1Q== ARC-Seal: i=2; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1725529381; a=rsa-sha256; cv=pass; b=LPLwprUSP8Oh4Oh5gC54d033+UO9c/CudRDbo36A0qLzAbtp08fXG/OhkjjOYpcLQOxwLF ujg/HX+XoB9cVlO7pO9bxm1zovqWIS91DEwxyIQK7Cpsusdz7ccPZRN45rVi3l4aH/70ST CDPFQ9VdpUKO/o8lIflJ+wdlHu0FLJXgpaL3QXuMOphOUNdutZ7M3vEDmGCcfG5vJKat2R vi6F6HGTbM7QQsryfbubvrfiMr16a3piuu7zNA4lbyELu+9pbrcf84FQNtluVBjnlRpU4U xfPW2Kuu1NBhve+IJhgmEn9zo76OY1zTZLvkJMxzD6YhTbywXk0ZZtuo1Q22cA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b="FVK1/ier"; arc=pass ("zohomail.com:s=zohoarc:i=1"); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B71D73EA7 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:43:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sm90s-00088k-Tt; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 05:42:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sm90r-00088a-Qi for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 05:42:49 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sm90q-0004bZ-Cc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 05:42:49 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1725529366; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=A+iLR3R13pPdmJkxsmQbFcfeLULJ8d6DMqvQGyHyAS/i90Ju2EXAQvWSZAOrBqXh48x7hvxcyEikfM4KIPG6pxybZfpUioa3hmfsfz11PlMuUwPWJb1rtubPeasdzrC7Z78KKs3vNK/Tf+DWwEGyrjXd0dBZgx/lyZwkOxc7gzo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1725529366; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=IctdJszUa1JKLFKPkQxN5pCR+/TameiCin27gWp1gFA=; b=nc7EOVAGjTnpcg36cXwIhCpuAv+xb1ejcqe4ftHnipUsPNIpBSYtTyyQS8vak02n97E2CNdDGC5rA4roXj6vURi5lcIAFz2OpbfCmIdixklkXV+QefZqHA4v0Q2wq8/K4tHsszf9QvuGVHDXrAw3ORhu4QORQg7EgM+2cuSiHTE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1725529366; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=IctdJszUa1JKLFKPkQxN5pCR+/TameiCin27gWp1gFA=; b=FVK1/ieri1/BUFOWt8THf1bVCACAh7l+NJc8KkGXWHooX7M1KHllp75gW1OdtlYF U5SwJMrxW1kyAn7iKlaxCMrOLsLF9aiSAcuyaBiN0hbfXkBjgchIMV597bn47llbz8S K5Om21sGt1bT4d/HBOboV3kXIke97/f4/gaY31RA= Received: by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1725529364850119.18176474390896; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 02:42:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Ricardo Wurmus To: =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= Batista Cc: Leo Famulari , 67535@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org, Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Does anyone use i686-linux? [was Re: bug#67535: ci.guix.gnu.org 'Cannot allocate memory' while building for i686-linux] In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Andr=C3=A9?= Batista"'s message of "Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:02:23 -0300") References: <87sevsxtqg.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:42:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87le06mo6m.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.51; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net; helo=sender4-of-o51.zoho.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.51 X-Spam-Score: -7.51 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 3B71D73EA7 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: m0qwOzB+dpGb Andr=C3=A9 Batista writes: >> > Keeping this to i686-linux specifically, what generation of hardware >> > supports i686 but not x86_64? Some (very) quick checking on wikipedia >> > suggests that the x60 from 2006 was either 32-bit or 64-bit, and I >> > believe there was an atom chip from 2015 that was 32-bit. Specifically, >> > that makes the newest hardware (at least from the CPU perspective) 10 >> > years old at least. >>=20 >> FWIW, I'm using one of those Atom chips in a netbook for an installation >> of Sugar Desktop. I upgrade it every few months or so. If I'm the only >> user of i686-linux I would not want to condemn the project to supporting >> the architecture for my sake. > > For the record, I'm another one still using those atom netbooks. I just noticed that my Atom-powered netbook should also be able to run an x86_64 system. I'll try to upgrade today; if this is successful I won't have any i686 system left at home. --=20 Ricardo