From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id KNLNFDw63GaodQEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 11:34:20 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id KNLNFDw63GaodQEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 13:34:20 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=a70KWppd; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=iba1STEm; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict), DKIM not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1725708860; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-to:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=QtYQGjiKZeNWWbSHMemo+vztD+yBw+xqJL9K7mZoKLo=; b=QP5C5X3wwx0XYL8JVu0qmaNZX2G7GJIp5tJETS22ymEwO9dApqfoF5U6nmduy9ipJg5Gf4 UeJTNR/i5NQugdenPLs6iP4LwQw6NaRWGuGFMxamNr/koafDXkpgvGi8NGsxL1+17h9uwl FGQMsEL9VED2+L0BMhMz4EZO+69/OrTx/gIEb6eU8kN3ZdXp1jXJLv0zE3a3fhJwKZDJy2 +k7hKP2da9rHIKtYuwjdcbqy8MA4ULcHCOFeiTKc/rmwSiMf29vqWMBzjatxGCozLGQTUM SGTv64ptd67tFx7fYWbH484rO5jzm1LDdnPkV3uRre0Msu9NfHy2se1TkvcF0w== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1725708860; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=AHYDWUom8iPJhGStxFHX/Hy1/W7OhlLkExDDdbMwasRbdUHTp9hNX5pX8OU3fIMkLmtR0I D74K64/yqw/DbDd5iVLBah/3D1ceDuGD/NnDKjZF0oYPU2Sx9ZiXiDjGxKTPn7cIRJOdkF UYyQA1AykG0FjjRY3hKXv8SVngXbufFKsA3DTcC46Ic88RtQbkMQ8+Bzlmoe3mHqW+sURn bWMPWdpGjl1Cxg7mfDJJneN0X3AUr/M5Mais6OATEho49w6WT04r0LDXIZqbwDCE5M7dUc OVImtjKrTyV8ytgJ5XzwrJJLzHxzbQndkttbR6ZFqMVsGEpJFYM5OC9k3/ic3g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=a70KWppd; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=iba1STEm; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict), DKIM not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96A9E6A80 for ; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 13:34:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smthb-00040n-TJ; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 07:34:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smthZ-000406-Tu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 07:34:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smthZ-0000Oa-Kf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 07:34:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=QtYQGjiKZeNWWbSHMemo+vztD+yBw+xqJL9K7mZoKLo=; b=a70KWppd7iqSZFB1nX2c+wj2+QxNaAgJ6a1ujPVOz9n1CY6ZHMt5PmoztO0qK+Vh0AafFildPy3LNtScZv+imLXhc/uszdjcoC0UAU1GxLl3fpwSKS/VNDINhVni3Uq/aLtAZO1m8N/F/0ioB7xLnsVwUEeguSPtAagNT3NKGpvqaKEEQLPbJ+2GWuRCD5OUI9FdVvfpOJHPT67IUBJYB6zpSlMMyoh3Yqucny/TSZoWVG11p3/+TdU36An9AxV7aApdiYUXAu+GriWciwO+eknQ+wWHOt5feDpwI6K/CrD2G87dZ+ktoJUdRj1CkoCi7g5C6Hnxu8CRS0aTu+mIjA==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smthZ-00062Q-S3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 07:34:01 -0400 Subject: bug#73056: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: cl-ciel: Update to 0.2.1 Resent-From: Guillaume Le Vaillant Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 11:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 73056 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Konrad Hinsen Cc: 73056-done@debbugs.gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: 73056@debbugs.gnu.org, glv@posteo.net, konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net Received: via spool by 73056-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D73056.172570881023160 (code D ref 73056); Sat, 07 Sep 2024 11:34:01 +0000 Received: (at 73056-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2024 11:33:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55046 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smth3-00061U-JV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 07:33:29 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:56605) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smth0-00061B-Sz for 73056-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 07:33:28 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F01FE240028 for <73056-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 13:33:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1725708797; bh=rtue2O9wTXujWzfkr0pYqZUhPWi5KNXRCe2jCcSpwsg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=iba1STEm9OM/V6ESxlHwWBXiZrmhBMZV2IbORPN1Rx+ZlznhQ+LYzVuQVqlHFnhj9 PxggRjBrRIetELlMvQe6RGkXr3IS8a+n1aPdkj7WbR/uQ1AXHF3y73ZaDdgRLWVSge b8bz6sZ90L+7Qp+usdKXxQesf2StXWxATkixeJqvDuzQrdNZKyrHspgEORZNMmTOCt 2/8yZzmJRe9yxT3AFXMc1koP+FpV5/fTnh9CqqGu5lY/S5c9QSYG21sOrjFAYpxhpP xprZ7byJETu9d7k+3yWUrBY4uLnimH/sYgV7IMf0Yoc/eXJV/lAVh8O62r1uVdcVXB a0wS4hLKdf2zw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4X19vb60Kxz6tw1; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 13:33:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Guillaume Le Vaillant In-Reply-To: (Konrad Hinsen's message of "Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:24:48 +0200") References: <875xr9jg6o.fsf@kitej> Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 11:33:15 +0000 Message-ID: <87le03y9z8.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.12 X-Spam-Score: -7.12 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 96A9E6A80 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: U94Lr2/YsjAs Konrad Hinsen skribis: > Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > >> Is building the core image useful, given that the sbcl-ciel-repl package >> will contain the binary with the same included features? > > The CIEL REPL is specifically meant for use in the terminal, whereas the > core image is recommended by upstream for use with Emacs/Slime and > similar environments. > >> If yes, it would be better to put it in the "lib/" directory instead of >> "bin/" (e.g. SBCL puts the default core image in "lib/sbcl/"). > > I have no strong opinions on the location. There is only one other > package in Guix that builds a core image. That's sbcl-slynk, and it > puts the image under /bin, so I did the same. > > There is some justification to this choice because the images are > actually executable. You can use either > > bin/ciel.image > > or > > sbcl --core bin/ciel.image > > with the same effect. > > As I said, I don't care much, but I think it would be preferable to have > a uniform policy about this in Guix, now that we have two packages that > build images :-) > > Cheers, > Konrad. Ok. Patch applied as 904f871378337b7c9e6ffa2b62d9a62a6d1e937d. Thanks.