From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?What=E2=80=99s?= next?
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 20:09:12 +0200
Message-ID: <87k3mybxvb.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87li7f28xb.fsf@gnu.org> <201305161112.48666.andreas@enge.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34041)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Ud5Z3-0004gE-Vg
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 17:18:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Ud5Yz-0002ko-Ba
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 17:18:17 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0b:1:123:ca0a:a9ff:fe03:271e] (port=56026
	helo=xanadu.aquilenet.fr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Ud5Yz-0002UV-4f
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 17:18:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <201305161112.48666.andreas@enge.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of
	"Thu, 16 May 2013 11:12:48 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> Am Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:
>> However, I would add a less ambitious 0.3 milestone, first, ideally to
>> be released before July.  For 0.3, I would like to add actual
>> cross-compilation support.  If everything goes well, that would allow
>> the MIPS/N64 port to be bootstrap (and perhaps an ARM port too?).
>
> This looks like an attractive goal to me.

Good.  :-)

>> 0.3 would also add interesting packages (GTK+, for instance), and bug=20
> fixes.
>
> I started some work on gtk+, with a few tentative recipes for cairo and=20
> pango. The cairo tests fail for the time being, and I will not be able to=
=20
> investigate during the next two weeks.

Could you perhaps commit Cairo with #:tests? #f for now?  That would
=E2=80=9Cunblock=E2=80=9D a few packages, and hopefully one of us can fix i=
t eventually.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.