From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: bug#15194: hop FTBFS
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:54:35 -0400
Message-ID: <87k3j75glw.fsf@tines.lan>
References: <87sixw5dxx.fsf@tines.lan> <87mwo3mtci.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40821)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1VEKfl-00067Y-1u
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:55:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1VEKff-0000Ph-6f
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:55:08 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36673)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1VEKff-0000Nf-3j
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:55:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1VEKfe-0007UE-6t
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:55:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.15194.B15194.137761529828768@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87mwo3mtci.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:27:25 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 15194@debbugs.gnu.org

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

> It turns out Hop & Bigloo have to be upgraded in lockstep.  I believe
> a new Hop version is around the corner, so I=E2=80=99m tempted to just wa=
it
> for that.
>
> WDYT?

I think we should find a solution that doesn't lead to the 'hop' build
being broken every time 'bigloo' is upgraded before 'hop'.

An obvious solution would be to keep two versions of 'bigloo': the
latest release, and the release that corresponds to the latest release
of 'hop'.  Hopefully these would be the same most of the time.

What do you think?

      Mark