From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sane-backends Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:19:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87k33vyfqx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k33wz8nj.fsf@gnu.org> <1413726820-13664-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org> <87y4scx8cj.fsf@gnu.org> <20141019183657.GA14491@jocasta.intra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38176) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xfwwe-00050i-Mt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 16:19:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XfwwZ-0004JC-Mz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 16:19:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20141019183657.GA14491@jocasta.intra> (John Darrington's message of "Sun, 19 Oct 2014 20:36:57 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Darrington Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, John Darrington John Darrington skribis: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 07:44:28PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote: > John Darrington skribis: >=20=20=20=20=20=20 > > + ;; It would seem that tests are not maintained - fails with > > + ;; the following: > > + ;; > > + ;; < This page was last updated on Wed Jul 31 07:52:48 2013 > > + ;; < by sane-desc 3.5 from sane-backends 1.0.24git > > + ;; --- > > + ;; > This page was last updated on Sun Oct 19 15:41:39 2014 > > + ;; > by sane-desc 3.5 from sane-backends 1.0.24 > > + ;; **** File generated for html-backends-split mode is differ= ent from reference > > + ;; Makefile:501: recipe for target 'check.local' failed >=20=20=20=20=20=20 > Perhaps it would be worth trying to s/24git/24/ and see if it works. > WDYT? >=20=20=20=20=20=20 > Well presumably the date would have to be substituted too. Oh, right; I had overlooked that. > I wonder how much it is wise to second guess what the developers wanted. = Presumably=20 > upstream haven't run "make check" since Jul 31 2013, so it seems that the= y don't > consider it important. Yes, that makes sense. OK to commit, then. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.