From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add vte. Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:25:12 -0500 Message-ID: <87k31r1s0n.fsf@netris.org> References: <1418535265-17233-1-git-send-email-iyzsong@gmail.com> <874msyfhob.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87bnn5mbkz.fsf@gmail.com> <87d27k2c59.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <87iohbkeux.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60267) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0uvq-0002CU-FL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:25:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0uvj-0004j7-7O for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:25:06 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:39014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0uvj-0004hJ-3V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:24:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87iohbkeux.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IuWui+aWh+atpiIncw==?= message of "Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:34:30 +0800") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 writes: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 writes: >> >>> David Thompson writes: >>>> Maybe call this one 'vte-gtk2'? 'vte-0' isn't very descriptive. >>> Basically, I intend to use the version of pc file, >>> for example, I have libwnck-1, which has libwnck-1.0.pc. >>> >>> Yes, this does make sense, but 'vte-gtk2' is look like another package, >>> how about 'vte/gtk+-2'? >> >> Package names cannot match the regexp "-[0-9]", because when >> 'package-name->name+version' in (guix utils) finds such a match, it >> interprets the part after the "-" as a version number. So if you run >> "guix package -i vte/gtk+-2", it will look for version "2" of a package >> named "vte/gtk+". > Ah, I think you mean the 'name' field of package? > > I'm talk about the variable name, for which we have gtk+-2, gtkmm-2 etc. You're right, my mistake. Nevermind :) Mark