From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: devel: Add indentation rules.
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:42:37 +0300
Message-ID: <87k2qojaeq.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <871tdm6i0i.fsf@gmail.com> <8737y28fss.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87d1x57yhg.fsf@gmail.com> <87si5zwqqu.fsf@gnu.org>
	<878u7qybjn.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87r3lhxchs.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87d1wyqoqw.fsf@gmail.com> <87wpv6l1d8.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87h9m9xwsf.fsf@gmail.com> <87a8s1e8mg.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87y4f8bfdn.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87ziznqey0.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87h9lur732.fsf@gmail.com> <871tcxqkyq.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40323)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1ZmmY6-00049Z-GU
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:42:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1ZmmY1-0005iU-HM
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:42:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <871tcxqkyq.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:00:29 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2015-10-14 23:00 +0300) wrote:

> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> As we are talking about it, there are a couple of workarounds in the
>> elisp code for the issues that were solved in Geiser 0.8.  So I would
>> like to get rid of them and mention in the manual that Geiser 0.8 is
>> required.  Apparently it shouldn't be done right now as it is too fast.
>> But how long should we wait?  Would a month be enough time, or maybe
>> wait until the next Geiser release?
>
> I would wait for at least a couple of releases.  It might be worth
> checking which version the major dist^W^W the other major distros ship
> before making a decision.

Ouch, it sounds like years, but OK I'll wait, thanks.

--=20
Alex