From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: [PATCH] build: pull: Compile .scm files in one process. Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:27:24 -0500 Message-ID: <87k2ovd02r.fsf@netris.org> References: <87si4kxtge.fsf@T420.taylan> <87611gdul8.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9kzy09b.fsf@T420.taylan> <87bnb6c0nh.fsf@gnu.org> <874mgyxhgy.fsf@T420.taylan> <877flpohu6.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvuku444.fsf@T420.taylan> <87pozgfyzt.fsf@gnu.org> <87io57tt2s.fsf@T420.taylan> <876117mnef.fsf@igalia.com> <87egfvtnbw.fsf@T420.taylan> <87y4e3l7hm.fsf@igalia.com> <87a8qjtje8.fsf@T420.taylan> <876117t0ax.fsf@gnu.org> <877flmrn2m.fsf@T420.taylan> <87a8q0ies5.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuzrlt6f.fsf@T420.taylan> <87bnafbvrs.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnaflbg2.fsf@T420.taylan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38338) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4VnG-0004ZE-6B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:27:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4VnA-00015q-Si for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:27:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87bnaflbg2.fsf@T420.taylan> ("Taylan Ulrich \=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=5C\=22Bay\=C4\=B1rl\=C4\=B1\=2FKammer\=5C\=22\=22's\?\= message of "Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:16:29 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer=22?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") writes: > It would be great if the whole circular import problem could somehow be > solved by Guile (no idea how feasible it is). I think we should eliminate circular module dependencies. They cause nasty problems, and there's no compelling reason that we need them, since our package dependency graph is necessarily a DAG. We can eliminate the circular dependencies by breaking up our package modules into smaller pieces. One package per module would trivially accomplish this, although I guess that's going too far. We might want to think about what tools could help us discover a much smaller number of package splittings that would eliminate the cycles, and to ensure that they would never again be introduced. Mark