From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: guix edit mutt -- with new option, and dependency, how I got it working Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:37:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87k2l92l0d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160310004446.GA23830@protected.rcdrun.com> <20160310014522.GB29687@jasmine> <20160310065806.GA2618@protected.rcdrun.com> <20160310204551.GA7510@jasmine> <20160310230649.4cced66d@debian-netbook> <20160310213433.GA9444@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52595) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeNGC-0000V4-D1 for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:37:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeNG9-0003Lg-8h for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:37:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160310213433.GA9444@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:34:33 -0500") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:06:49PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 15:45:51 -0500 [...] >> > I agree that we should build our Mutt with this option enabled. >> >=20 >> > If everyone agrees, the question is which database to use =E2=80=94 we= have gdbm >> > and bdb in our package tree (I think tokyocabinet is a WIP). I have no >> > idea which database is a better choice. What do people think? >>=20 >> Assuming mutt, gdbm and bdb build on all architectures, comparing guix g= raph >> of mutt, gdbm and bdb, and the graph of the two databases is identical. = The >> only other input I have is that debian uses tokyocabinet as a dependancy. > > It looks like they both build on all architectures. > > Gdbm is a little smaller and it's a GNU project, so I vote for gdbm, in > the absence of any knowledge of the two databases' technical merits. +1. (I wonder how this relates to the subject of this message, though. ;-)) Ludo=E2=80=99.