From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: NEWS for 0.10.0
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:22:50 +0200
Message-ID: <87k2kjacet.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87h9fryfub.fsf@gnu.org> <87twjrvbyb.fsf@gnu.org>
	<1459303276.4007.9.camel@openmailbox.org> <87vb44xs8l.fsf@T420.taylan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40165)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1alNZo-00028M-97
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:22:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1alNZl-0000Tq-4N
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:22:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87vb44xs8l.fsf@T420.taylan> ("Taylan Ulrich
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=5C\=22Bay\=C4\=B1rl\=C4\=B1\=2FKammer\=5C\=22\=22's\?\=
	message of "Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:52:26 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?=
	=?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer=22?= <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") skribis:

> I much prefer the current COC to both that of GNOME and Debian.
>
> I think trying to be apolitical is naive.  In practice it boils down to
> accepting the status quo.  In an unjust society, some injustices appear
> normal, therefore dissent against them is seen as more "political" than
> the tolerance of those injustices, even though tolerating injustices is
> surely a political move.

+1.  (I too know +1s are lame, but hey! ;-))

In my view, GNOME=E2=80=99s CoC fails to send as clear a signal to people f=
rom
underrepresented groups, making it much less useful.

BTW, I find that v1.4 of the Covenant is better structured and worded
than v1.3, which is what we currently use:

  http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/

Maybe we should switch to that version.

Ludo=E2=80=99.