From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add LAPACKE Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:21:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87k2gqhogo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160708154008.24871-1-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMzUv-0006Ol-FQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:21:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMzUq-0003q2-0H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:21:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160708154008.24871-1-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:40:07 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi! Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > here's an alternative to the patch provided here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-06/msg00099.html > > Instead of building LAPACKE as part of the lapack package this patch adds= a > new package "lapack-with-lapacke". I did this because an increase in clo= sure > size of 20MiB is a little much for a commonly used package, in my opinion. The 20=C2=A0MiB increase shown in the message above correspond mostly to gcc:lib, which is present anyway, so I would say it=E2=80=99s acceptable. WDYT? Ludo=E2=80=99.