From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:07:59 +0200
Message-ID: <87k2ggd3ls.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <578A854F.30302@cock.li> <20160717073206.GA17182@jasmine>
	<87shv84crp.fsf@gnu.org> <20160717173334.GA2626@jasmine>
	<20160718164855.GA3227@jasmine> <20160718171552.GA20926@jasmine>
	<87shv5kch6.fsf@gnu.org> <20160719170535.GA17723@jasmine>
	<20160720040410.GA24331@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40026)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bPoQC-00041r-V6
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 06:08:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bPoQ8-00070R-PK
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 06:08:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160720040410.GA24331@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Wed,
	20 Jul 2016 00:04:10 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:05:35PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:02:13PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> > So GnuTLS already doesn=E2=80=99t build on core-updates, right?  In th=
at case,
>> > we should go ahead an update it.
>>=20
>> I built 3.5.2 on master, but now there is another test failure,
>> 'testdsa'. I've attached the log.
>
> It builds with net-tools, with provides netstat.
>
> The output does not retain a reference to net-tools (good!), so I pushed
> the update to core-updates 5d4c90ae0.

Great, thanks for taking care of it!

I have merged master in core-updates (there was a surprisingly large
number of pointless conflicts, I wonder why) and started an evaluation
on Hydra (it was done building master on i686 and x86_64).

Let=E2=80=99s see how it goes!

Ludo=E2=80=99.