From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: gnupg: Update to 2.1.16. Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 00:31:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87k2bz9hd9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20161119224131.GA16874@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20161119230930.GA7836@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8F6c-0006hK-7f for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 18:31:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8F6b-0000aP-At for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 18:31:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20161119230930.GA7836@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 19 Nov 2016 18:09:30 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi, Leo Famulari writes: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 12:41:31AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> Looks like they forgot to bootstrap it then. > > Because I altered two Makefile.am files in the 'patch-paths' phase, I > had to re-do the bootstrap in order for the Makefiles to be regenerated. > > I'm not an expert on Autotools. Does anyone know if there is a better > way? I have not tried but unless some weird issue, I think you can safely replace "/bin/pwd" directly in the generated Makefile(s) instead of the Makefile.am sources. This should fix the Autotools dependency and the warning. -- Mathieu Lirzin