From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: flex: Update to 2.6.2. Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:51:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87k2blu9oi.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <20161129214340.20725-1-david@craven.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBsBS-0006nH-R5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:51:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBsBO-0005xm-Ub for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:51:34 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:47773) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cBsBO-0005xP-OQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:51:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20161129214340.20725-1-david@craven.ch> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: David Craven , guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain David Craven writes: > * gnu/packages/flex.scm (flex): Update to 2.6.2. > [native-inputs]: Add help2man. > [origin]: Update uri to github. Remove CVE-2016-6354 patch. > * gnu/packages/patches/flex-CVE-2016-6354.patch: Delete file. > --- > gnu/packages/flex.scm | 16 ++++++++------ > gnu/packages/patches/flex-CVE-2016-6354.patch | 30 --------------------------- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/flex-CVE-2016-6354.patch LGTM. Note that [origin] should be [source]. Can you update [home-page] too? And I think it's okay to remove the 'flex-2.6.1' package (and update users) in the same commit. Apparently only ~27 rebuilds, so should be good for 'master'. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlg+FH0ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrblQf/elH9DOYB9qC1M2y3/xAyOLIInFyuFhUFk89cH8xTZMQfTOFHh+rlkn+M Ke+4PDpIQZkhkWn+rEccGwsv+zBTMH1FTmVLCDgtcCmza4zQmlmJ/xdTSvR25fpI 2b6KFc4vusgBAMiTMYfaSd+RAKP2U50YcrnrVoKuycyhgtcV53mCqaPRiCNdZ4h3 fTnjJwvie53Q/3nbgUVmlcfyNbCNlOdXdssStiQNe19oOv9Vja40SskSeCkodvjm Un+3YeFKzQzrAgNkWeO1YfKSSlidASjo3CehB4R3sWYnEgyfuFmnIA8kLZhJkHwF gq9oHGxDYgS3uy4jbp3eu0LEnjgjvA== =/lHn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--