From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH][WIP] gnu: Add debbugs. Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:41:37 +0000 Message-ID: <87k2auwqtq.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87zimti03i.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87vaxdl5yi.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2dtl1eq.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56739) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJMY2-0004Bc-3X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:41:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJMY1-0005m4-4q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:41:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87k2dtl1eq.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org ng0 writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> ng0 skribis: >> >>> So, here's debbugs. Disclaimer: I never ran or did setup or got in any >>> way in touch with debbugs on a server. >>> >>> Input welcome to adjust. All I know is that we'll need a service to make >>> this work. I have no reasonable interest in this, so I won't go all the >>> way. I'd like to fix this package up as far as usage goes. >>> I can not test it running, but from the build/install perspective it is >>> done. There are structures in code which can be changed etc, but this >>> was done in about ~30 minutes to get some input as I thought, hey we use >>> debbugs.. why do we not have debbugs packaged already? >> >> Because nobody did it I guess. >> >> Could you send an non-WIP patch? Since you mark it as WIP, people most >> likely don’t look at it, because there’s already so many patches to >> review. Please take extra time to test it and resend when you think >> it’s ready to apply. >> >> Thank you! >> >> Ludo’. >> > > Technically this is finished and can be applied on master. Why I can't > test it I have described in the text above the email - I have no idea > how debbugs behaves, what is expected etc.. that's why I think someone > with an interest to replace debbugs on their (mostly) debian based > server with debbugs from Guix should test it. I try to get to the point where I have an local or external server running GuixSD some time between now and end of spring, so I will be able to easily test this. I'll work on this and come up with an patch which is no longer "work in progress", nevertheless some feedback on the original patch from someone (search the archives for "gnu: Add debbugs", I don't provide links I don't need) would be highly appreciated. I haven't reviewed myself after the time which passed, I hope it's not too horrible. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 | PGP keys and more: https://n0is.noblogs.org/ | http://ng0.chaosnet.org